Goes without saying.

That is correct ! The moon landing hoax is VERY exciting ! It is like an electro-shock treatment for one's brain. When I FINALLY accepted it, I was really kicking myself that I believed it for so long, and afforded the notion of man landing on the moon such a sanctified place in history, and in my world view, even though it didn't make sense to me, and even though I had many teachers and professors, even professors of physics, saying it was a hoax. I just figured, " Surely, it must be true, because so many other people accept it. How can a lie be so big ? And, would the government and media lie about something like that ? " Well, AFTER I realized that 911 was an inside job ( I am embarrassed to say that it took me until Feb 2009 to fully realize this truth ), accepting that the moon landing was a hoax was a no-brainer. When someone on the internet tipped me off about this, I accepted it right away. I looked again at the astronauts going "hippitty-hop, hippitty-hop" on what they said was the moon, and I finally realized how fake the whole thing was. It is amazing that they ever expected that people would believe that bullshit. I laughed really hard for hours ---- it was the biggest laugh I have ever had in my life !

I decided to make the moon landing hoax into my name, because I realized its enormous psychological impact, and power to wake people up to the fact that we are all REALLY like living in a fake reality of what the media and history books tells us, just like in the movie "The Matrix." It is a clue to how your BRAIN works. You see, you do not permit yourself to trust your own judgment and what your own eyes are telling you. An experiment was already done on this. Watch this ---- type into youtube : ASCH CONFORMITY EXPERIMENT

The notion that man landed on the moon has the HIGHEST product of being an "officially sanctioned fact", multiplied by it ALSO being "total bullshit" However, when I saw "Nuke Lies" by Jesse, I must say that the "Ivy Mike" explosion being a total and obvious fake comes very close to the moon landing hoax. i am VERY surprised that the official position of the government has NOT been to admit at least that the footage was fake, and those were not real witnesses.

Anyone should accept that the "Ivy Mike" explosion is a total fake at once, without other preparation in science, or historical revisionism. And there are a lot of propagandists in panic mode that the internet has afforded an opportunity to expose just how ridiculous that "Ivy Mike" footage is, that they have to go around defending it. I actually heard about the "Ivy Mike" explosion being a fake on the street, in real life, from different people, on different occasions, before I found out about this on the internet. Anyone who seriously believes that "Ivy Mike" footage is legitimate is beyond hope, IMHO.

What about lunar orbiters, Mars orbiters, Mars rover, Neptune, Venus, Uranius flyby? Venus, Mercury probes?

I have a paperback copy of 'The Planets' by Heather Couper and Nigel Henbest. The cover design - of Jupiter - on examination, is a painting. This led me to check further. My Amazon review---

This is a Pan book published in 1985, related to a Channel 4 TV series. My copy has a section of an image of Jupiter on the cover. This image in fact on examination is a painting - probably gouache or coloured chalks. The book also contains many standard 'moon landing' photos known to be fakes. Ditto with Mars. This is basically a picture book of phoniness, intended, no doubt, to keep funding directed to these people. Worth buying if you want evidence of the corruption of modern science. Also must be an artefact for students of image processing: black and white photography, cine film, digital capture, image processing all have their little tricks and styles of retouching.

I don't believe the images for example of Saturn are genuine - the ones with multiple finely detailed rings. I can't believe that a high-quality digital image could be broadcast back to earth from 600 million miles or so, and certainly not before 1985 when the first primitive IBM PCs were the apex of computing.

@ FirstClassSkeptic ---- those may or may not happened. The world's leading moon hoax researcher on the technical and photo editing aspects is Jarrah White. I am youtube friends with him. He used to have a lot of stuff on his channel about the Mars explorers being fake. But he decided to eliminate those. I think he thought it muddled the message. There is such overwhelming evidence that the moon landing is a hoax, that these other things are peripheral. Discussing them after the moon landing hoax is an anti-climax.

With the moon landing hoax, you have enormous, obvious scientific evidence, such as no evidence of one-sixth gravity on the moon in the Apollo footage, and historical evidence, such as James Webb retiring from NASA just days before Apollo 7 and two months before man supposedly went to the moon ( but did not land ) with Apollo 8. You have the astronauts obviously lying, in the CLIP OF APOLLO 11 PRESS CONFERENCE ( search for it on youtube ), and the astronauts refusing to swear on the Bible that they went to the moon, and getting very angry and /or fearful when asked to do so ( google : DID WE REALLY LAND MEN ON THE MOON ? )

So, the shock value, and the wake-up value of just revealing to the public the absolute FACT that man has never gone to the moon is very great. In order to accommodate this fact into one's world view of history, then one also has to do some heavy lifting, historically, and re-evaluate the Cold War, which, as another matter of fact, was certainly not what the public has been lead to believe.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... urant.html

A woman who tried to sell a rare chunk of moon rock for $1.7 million U.S. (£1million) was caught out when her prospective customer turned out to be an undercover Nasa investigator.

It is illegal to sell moon rocks, which are considered national treasures.

Well, it's obvious that what she had wasn't a moon rock, since no one has gone to the moon. Notice who is the crime lab here: NASA. Since NASA is pulling a bigger fraud than the woman, I don't see how you could trust them.

Anyone want to be her defense witness? "These couldn't possibly be moon rocks, your honor." But the judge has to play along with the game also, or he's out of a job.

Remember these hilarious news items

1. A moon rock given to the Dutch prime minister by Apollo 11 astronauts in 1969 has turned out to be a fake.

Source--> https://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/spac ... -fake.html

2. "We call it "simulated lunar regolith'," says McLemore. "We need just the right kind of rocks to make this stuff, and we're getting them from the Stillwater Mine in Nye, Montana."

Source--> https://www.moondaily.com/reports/Sixtee ... t_999.html


*Item #2 has been removed from NASA's website. ROFLMAO! Fortunately, I saved a PDF of the story from NASA's website that includes a couple of funny pictures and the names of the people involved in creating this fake Moon Dust.


People involved in the Lunar Regolith Simulant Development and Characterization effort:

At Marshall Space Flight Center:
1. VP33/John Fikes - Deputy Project Manager
2. VP61/Dr. Doug Rickman - Chief Project Scientist (Geologist)
3. BAE (Sub-contractor to Teledyne Brown Engineering)/Christian Schrader –Geologist
4. Teledyne Brown Engineering/Hans Hoelzer (Mathematician - Figures of Merit)
5. Teledyne Brown Engineering/Kathy Fourroux (Software - Figures of Merit)
6. VP33/Carole McLemore - Project Manager

At the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS)
1. Dr. Steve Wilson (Chemist)
2. Dr. Doug Stoeser (Geologist)
3. Dr. Greg Meeker
4. Dr. Geoff Plumlee

** What got me interested in the Moon Walk Hoax, after I awoke to 9/11, was that I was going to a Gym where each day I talked to this 80 year old JEW (most of my friends/acquaintances back then were JEWS), who just happened to have made his couple of MILLION dollars selling a computer program to NASA that supposedly helped track the Apollo spaceships.

This is an old article I found..... that when put together with the Moon Walk Hoax (last one being 1972) tells me how the Soviets were partially PAID OFF to keep the Moon Walk secret.

Another Soviet Grain Sting: How the Russians again outfoxed the experts

Source--> https://www.time.com/time/magazine/artic ... 64,00.html

'Space has lost its glamour': New tapes reveal how JFK fretted over selling Apollo moon mission to U.S. public

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... blic.html#

Porter said some historians have speculated Kennedy would have backed away from the space program if he won a second term. But the tape indicates he was hoping to be in office when America reached the moon.

On the tape, Kennedy asks Webb if there's any chance the lunar landing will happen during a second term. Webb says no, and the president sounds deflated.

'It's just going to take longer than that,' Webb says. 'This is a tough job, a real tough job.'

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/ ... mples.html

Moon may have as much water as earth scientists find after studying 1972 Apollo samples

And it's true!! Look at the second picture where the astronaut has caught a fish.

The U.S. Attorney's office in St. Louis, which announced the recovered moon dust on Thursday, said that investigators with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) believed the dust had come from the film cartridge of a camera used by astronauts on the trip to the moon in 1969.

The dust was lifted from the cartridge using a one inch piece of clear tape.

Somehow, it reached the black market and was sold in 2001 to a German collector, NASA investigators believe.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... house.html

Notice the comments