[rerevisionist]

"NUCLEAR BOMBS NOT REAL?" 2014 UK

From about 3 June 2016, 'alfredomafioso' commented to my video (people being asked if they'd heard the idea that nukes were a fraud or fake), specifically on whether X Rays can make metals radioactive, and thus the Pantex X ray equipment in Texas could fake a radioactive nuclear weapon.

Below are his comments (as alfredomafiosi) and e-mails (as aladin). Spelling, punctuation untouched. He claims

[1] Only elements such as uranium can be made radioactive by X rays, I'm guessing by augmenting neutrons in the nuclei.
[2] Hiroshima was faked. (He doesn't comment on supposed nuclear weapons used in e.g. Afghanistan, as reported for example by the 'British' Broadcasting Corp.)
[3] He seems to confuse H-bombs with neutron bombs or something similar. He emailed: 'because the H bomb is at the origin of the Neutron bomb (so they say). Since the fusion reaction produces mostly neutrons and very little that is radioactive, the concept of a "clean" bomb has resulted: one having a small atomic trigger, a less fissionable tamper, and therefore less radioactive fallout. Carrying this progression further results in the neutron bomb....'
[4] Most relevant here, he gives several wars lost by the USA, Soviet Union, Britain, and Israel, and claims atomic bombs would certainly have been used.
      Note that he doesn't accept the division between a country, and the Jews controlling it. For example, Jews made money out of all the US wars he mentions, and caused chaos, which they wanted. Even if the USA lost, Jews won.

[He tells me his name is Aladin Belarbi. 'Disciple' of Eustace Mullins, and Roger Garaudy.]

[Alfredomafioso]

alfredomafioso 1 week ago
I am a radiologist metallography ( X Ray and gamma rays )/ engineer. I work on ionizisation phenomena. I confirm the suspicion about the atomic bomb as being a pure Jewish hoax ( Bernard Barich / Leehman & other banks / Oppenheimer banks ). How can I get in touch with Mr West ??

On 2016-06-05 15:09, Aladin wrote:
> Dear Mr West,

I am a structural engineer with a master degree in Welding (Radiometallography) and my major is on ionization process since X and Gamma ray as the main tool of structural inspection.

I have reviewed all your documents and video and so far everything makes sense. From the uncontrolled chain reaction of the atomic bomb to the Rothschild monopoly of the power plants activity.

I have reviewed all the Nagasaki and Hiroshima footage, where supposedly the temperature reached 6000 deg Celsius, (CS melt at 1560 and Titanium at 2500 deg C) yet nothing melted there, not even the rubber covering the electrical wire in the middle of ground zero.

Technically israel (aka Rothschild private camp) had the bomb since the mid 60s (killing of JFK) yet, they lost the 1973 war and were totally defeated had it not been the US intervention (6th fleet entering the war), so why didn't they use it when the arab armies were few miles from Tel Aviv, they had to call the US army...

Had the A bomb existed israel would have used it in 1948 against its arab enemies, since israel has only enemies thoughout history.

Regards,

1 week ago
There's absolutely no proof that a nuclear bomb ( uncontrolled chain reaction ) has ever taken place.

---

alfredomafioso 1 day ago
Very simple, the Atom Bomb supposedly produces 6000 deg Celsius (12 000 F) within half mile radius of its center (ground zero); this temperature MELT AND VAPORISE EVERYTHING ..the most heat resistant heat metal is Tungsten, and its melt a 3000 deg C(9000F)...well, on Hiroshima, the ground zero pictures show a standing bridge. standing buildings and more crazy than anything,..the rubber covering the electrical wire didn't even melt....are you freaking kidding me ??

Sorry, I would like to rephrase my last sentence : The material that become radioactive , or irradiated (keeping its ionization) are the material that have isotopes proprieties ( U 235 to 239...Plutonium with an atomic number that upgrade to another atomic number when irradiated).

Again, look at the US, who supposedly built the Atom bomb. lets do a practical analysis.

The US lost many wars after 1945 :
- Korea
- Viet Nam
- Iraq (they lost it, as example they couldn't control Fallujah, they had to bomb the civilians with yellow phosphorus)

The USSR had the A and H bomb , yet they lost after 12 years of war in Afghanistan,

The UK had A and H bomb (the footage of the British H BOMB test is laughable, they show the regular mushroom cloud, and orange ball of fire, well, the H bomb supposedly does not create heat but is known to be a cold process releasing intense radiation only , where animal and human cells are killed but not plant and material which stay intact).

The UK lost the Argentinian war (at least they didn't win it), by loosing a number of soldiers higher than the number of British soldiers lost during WW I and II combined,....don't you think that the BITCH would have used it ? she worked for the Rothschild and she kept her money offshore...

Now, if you look at Francois Mitterand memoir , he said that she called him demanding the French missile code that were downing the British planes. Mitterand refused, to which she threatened to throw the nuclear bomb on Buenos Aires ....supposedly

so The British kept the highlands by cracking the code of the French missiles....after having lost a tremendous number of soldiers....that's the only true fact...

But Israel is the best part....
Knowing just too well the middle east crisis, I can tell you that if a such weapon has ever existed, Israel would have thrown a dozen bombs on every Arab capital in 1973. Had Israel possessed a such weapon , they would have never used terrorism (al CIAda and ISISrael).

Look at the MOSSAD responsibility in 9/11,....they would have killed 3 millions of Americans instead of 3 thousands.

In the book BY WAY OF DECEPTION THOU SHALL DO WAR, written by former Mossad agent Victor Ostrowsky , he , himself point out the fact that during the early 80s an Israeli nuclear team worked with Indian physicist team on some nuclear project for both civil and weapon industry. Victor Ostrowsky pointed out the fact, that the Israeli team didn't bring anything to the work but took all the research and test experiment from the Indian team. The Indians got so upset that they interrupted the joint venture.
    My point is, if Israeli had any atom bomb/ nuclear capabilities why would they spend research with others, and on the top of that seeking everything from them while sharing nothing with them....that just makes no sense... Regards,