[rerevisionist]

Some people describe NUKELIES of this website as a 'self-confessed' Freemason; this worried me a bit as it might be used as a reason to avoid this 'nukelies' site. So here's a recent comment from him, with permission---

Yes - I was initiated into the East Lancashire Masons when I was in Manchester. I enjoyed going to the lodge meetings and got along well with the members. I no longer attend anything Masonic whatsoever, though I still very much like Freemasonry. My thoughts, actions, and opinions are not in the least bit compromised by my membership. I derive no income nor material benefits whatsoever from my membership or association with Freemasonry.

If you'd like to mention my membership please feel free. Blue Lodge Freemasonry is no more compromising than church attendance, believe me. Although the other members might very well have known more than they let on, none of them seemed any more knowledgeable about esoteric matters than I am from my research on the internet. In fact, they seemed quite underexposed to, and disinterested in, esoteric matters, and seemed to be more interested in the social aspects of the organisation.

The rituals are all memorised from books and workbooks which I believe can all be downloaded from the internet. The oaths are standard and also accessible on the internet. I joined in the hopes that it might afford me the opportunity to gain access to hidden knowledge, and such knowledge might be available to higher degree masons, but I found the hierarchy to be limiting and put in my resignation from my lodge when I moved away from Manchester.

I still crave knowledge, but believe that much of Kabala and Hermetics is a Black Hole with no answer. Much of it is a ruse.

All labels such as Freemason or Jew or Christian or Black or Republican or Tory or Artist or whatever else hold no real value for me. I have always been outside the box and that includes Freemasonry which I genuinely appreciate, but I simply do not belong to any group whatsoever. I was raised in a Hindu cult, for example, but most certainly do not subscribe to Hinduism or its idolatry.

[bamzam]

Here's a curious online book I once came across that claims that despite seeming like a big gentleman's club form the outside where power is shared and consolidated among men for men, at its true core that couldn't be further from the truth.

https://masongoddess.blogspot.com/

[rerevisionist]

Well-written post from 'Edward' on Amren:-

January 19, 2012

The traditional Catholic view of Freemasonry is that of a Jewish banker-sponsored Gentile auxiliary force. It is organized, like Judaism, as series of increasingly secretive concentric circles. Members in the outer circles are the first line of defense but are misled about the hidden aims and associations of their leaders. Loyalty is rewarded with first preference for employment at banker-controlled corporations and governments.

Freemasonry was repeatedly condemned in successive Eighteenth and Nineteenth Century papal encyclicals. Catholic traditionalists maintain that the 1960's Vatican II reforms were imposed by secretly pledged Freemasons that infiltrated to high offices in the Church.

The Anti-masonc Party was the first modern political party in the United States. In the Protocols of the Elders of Zion, protocol 15 says “we shall create and multiply free masonic lodges in all the countries of the world.” A few years ago, the Southern Baptist Convention almost succeeded in banning Masonic adherents but was ultimately thwarted.

The three key foundational events of the modern revolutionary era were the 1688 Glorious Revolution, the 1694 Bank of England incorporation, and the 1717 establishment of modern Freemasonry. The Bank of England is the mother bank of all subsequent central banks including the Federal Reserve.

[Exorcist]

I can't express adequately my agreement with and support for the articles published above. Special thanks to NukeLies for his courage in giving permission to publish his comment. I am aware of the oft denied, but all too frequently exercised malicious sanctions and victimisation directed at renounced Freemasons or outsiders (termed the "The Profane") who oppose the machinations of their secretive network. Being one of the "Profane", and having been attacked in this way, I can vouch for the truth of the allegations mentioned in the above article. The similarities inherent in Freemasonary and Talmudism regarding the treatment of insiders/outsiders are so striking as to be beyond mere coincidence. To understand the way this "control system" exerted it's influence, both in Ancient Hebrew tribes and throughout recorded history I would urge people to read:

The Controversy of Zion by Douglas Reed

It was an eye opener for me. I believe it's available as a free download on Scribd. It was removed from the Douglas Reed site a Google search takes you to. This censorship is par for the course for authors who publish the truth.

[Exorcist]

Free pdf download of "The Controversy of Zion" also available at the following link in the aaargh section of the VHO website.
People need to wake up to the fact that most of the so called "Jews", who manipulated history by their control of money, are in fact "fake Jews"....Kazars or Ashkenazi whose genetic and tribal roots have nothing whatsoever to do with the Biblical tribe of Judah.

See Chapter 17: The Destructive Mission, Page 92 of Reed's Book. When I refer to "Jews" in this and other posts I am referring to the "fake Jews" described in Reed's epic work below and their psychopathic Talmudic agenda:

https://vho.org/aaargh/fran/livres/reeedcontrov.pdf

[NUKELIES]

The three key foundational events of the modern revolutionary era were the 1688 Glorious Revolution, the 1694 Bank of England incorporation, and the 1717 establishment of modern Freemasonry. The Bank of England is the mother bank of all subsequent central banks including the Federal Reserve.

That is a brilliant quote. England has been suffering under the weight of Bank oppression, otherwise known as Socialism, for three centuries. This is what was great and possibly unprecedented about America - it was a temporarily successful and truly British attempt to get out from under the dominion of the Bank Cabal. It really only lasted until the American Civil War - roughly 90 years - and was fraught with attempts by Hamilton and other Bank of England agents to establish a central bank in the newfound republic, but it was a truly sovereign nation for nearly a century - quite an achievement. It was such a powerful achievement, in fact, that the Bank was able to milk and bleed America for more than another century - up until now - 2012. We are now a bled-out shell on the brink of death.

[FirstClassSkeptic]

. It really only lasted until the American Civil War - roughly 90 years - and was fraught with attempts by Hamilton and other Bank of England agents to establish a central bank in the newfound republic, but it was a truly sovereign nation for nearly a century - quite an achievement.

Aaron Burr shot Alexander Hamilton in a duel. Aaron Burr has been labeled as a traitor, but I think he really knew what was going on.

Hamilton helped George Washington write his famous Farewell Address. If you read it, you'll see that it's really a plan, written in the guise of a warning.

[rerevisionist]

FirstClassSkeptic wrote
Hamilton helped George Washington write his famous Farewell Address. If you read it, you'll see that it's really a plan, written in the guise of a warning.

Sounds like Eisenhower's 'Military-Industrial Complex' address! That address always puzzled me, because after all he was military himself, though I've he was promoted over the heads of very many better qualified men. And he'd presumably supported the way the system had been developed, since he seemed to have done nothing about it. The solution appears to be that many Generals and Field Marshals etc are rather simple-minded types, unaware of the background work being done to keep them equipped.

Hamilton (not very well known in England) is specifically mentioned in Bertrand Russell's history of the long 19th century as one of the most influential people of all time, who made America safe for the rich. But he didn't develop this theme - Russell's view of rich Americans was I think bounded by Carnegie and Rockefeller rather than the shadowy Fed members, and Baruch and the like.

[bamzam]

You should all watch this, its called "The money masters - how International bankers got control of America." You won't likely get through it in one sitting as it is 215 minutes long.

https://video.google.com/videoplay?docid ... 0256183936

To bring it back more on topic in the video you will see how Andrew Jackson fought the bank and not only was he a freemason but Grand Master of Tennesse. Even Lincoln who took up the helm in the fight against the Banksters almost became a freemason

Abraham Lincoln was not a freemason. He applied for membership in Tyrian Lodge, Springfield, Ill., shortly after his nomination for the presidency in 1860 but withdrew the application because he felt that his applying for membership at that time might be construed as a political ruse to obtain votes. He advised the lodge that he would resubmit his application again when he returned from the presidency.
On Good Friday, April 14, 1865, Lincoln was assassinated at Ford’s Theatre in Washington by John Wilkes Booth. On the death of the president, Tyrian Lodge adopted, on April 17, 1865, a resolution to say "that the decision of President Lincoln to postpone his application for the honours of Freemasonry, lest his motives be misconstrued, is the highest degree honourable to his memory."

https://freemasonry.bcy.ca/biography/wan ... oln_a.html

edit:

another opponent that was also assasinated,

JAMES A.GARFIELD
20th President, born 1831; died 1881; initiated and passed in Magnolia Lodge No. 20, Columbus, Ohio, and raised in Columbus Lodge No.3O, 1864. Affiliated with Garrettsville Lodge No. 246 in 1866 Affiliated with Pentalpha Lodge No. 23 Washington, D. C. as charter member in 1869. Exalted in Columbus Royal Arch Chapter, 1866 and Knight Templar, 1866. 14th Degree Scottish Rite, 1872.

[rerevisionist]

There was a once-famous law case which was supposed to have damaged the 'image' of Freemasons, in 19th century USA - a murder. I don't want to look it up; maybe someone can supply US-based info about it. It might well have been related to other Jewish-related murders.
-----------------------------------------
"Patton was killed by a Jewish assassin" - comment from Youtube

[See Book review May 2013]

[See Book review May 2013]

[Exorcist]

There was a once-famous law case which was supposed to have damaged the 'image' of Freemasons, in 19th century USA - a murder.

I think you are referring to the murder of Captain Morgan.

https://www.truevine.net/~forchrist@truevine.net/Morgan.htm

I remember reading about it some years ago. There's a lot of stuff available on the net for those who wish to research it.

[rerevisionist]

Authorship of 'The Protocols of Zion' - was it Rothschild?

Interesting though very incomplete short article by Henry Makow - 'Did Rothschild write the Protocols of ZIon?' (which incidentally includes figures for murders in Russia by Jews in most of 1921-1922)---
https://100777.com/node/504
Makow quotes comments that the knowledge of banking, and experience of group psychology, needed an insider to write the 'Protocols'. However Makow doesn't refer to the 19th century French novel on which they may have been based (unless it was the other way round); nor does he speculate on how such a written document might have circulated - to whom it might have been sent, for example. But It doesn't seem impossible that Rothschild, after the 'Congress of Vienna' trying to settle the Napoleonic Wars - which after all had something like the effect of a World War - might have worked out a policy aimed against Russia, and circulated it to a few trusted confederates, but which was discovered in Russia in the 1900s.