HOLOCAUST REVISIONISM and its Results

Ramifications of nuclear issues are everywhere: subjects loosely or remotely linked to the nuclear bomb myth

Re: Fundamental Revisionism in History - Holocaust Revisioni

Postby FirstClassSkeptic » 10 Oct 2011 16:21

rerevisionist wrote:
[2] You keep repeating that there is reliable evidence of mass killings - documentary, eye-witness, and physical. This is simply not the case. Its only because of censorship that the stories could even be remotely seen as credible.


And if anyone in Europe presents any evidence that there were no mass killings, no mass graves, no gas chambers at Auschwitz, they are jailed for a number of years. Even an attorney who defended one who did this was jailed. So you are not likely to find any evidence disputing the official version. Only the official version is allowed by law.
User avatar
FirstClassSkeptic
 
Posts: 671
Joined: 20 Mar 2011 21:19

Re: Revisionism in History - Holocaust Revisionism

Postby Wroclaw » 24 Oct 2011 01:23

Hello,

Saw "rerevisionist" posting at CODOH and a Web search turned this forum up.

Wondering whether you've engaged in any genuine debate over Holocaust issues. CODOH is mainly a rev circle jerk.
Wroclaw
 

Re: Revisionism in History - Holocaust Revisionism

Postby rerevisionist » 24 Oct 2011 02:25

'Wroclaw', one more insult and you're banned. If you have something to say, relevant, however remotely, to nuclear issues, say it. If not, don't.
User avatar
rerevisionist
Site Admin
 
Posts: 1056
Joined: 18 Mar 2011 11:40

Re: Revisionism in History - Holocaust Revisionism

Postby Wroclaw » 24 Oct 2011 02:58

Well, rerevisionist, you touted "Did Six Million Really Die" over at CODOH. I'm curious to know why you find that particular work compelling?
Wroclaw
 

Re: Revisionism in History - Holocaust Revisionism

Postby rerevisionist » 24 Oct 2011 13:03

It's short, it's an overview - it covers the entire field of WW2 - and it's been around since about 1970 without refutation, and it's fairly easy for anyone online to find and download. There are longer books, and enormously more detailed ones, but as an English-language introduction it works well enough.
User avatar
rerevisionist
Site Admin
 
Posts: 1056
Joined: 18 Mar 2011 11:40

Re: Revisionism in History - Holocaust Revisionism

Postby Wroclaw » 24 Oct 2011 16:29

I think it can be easily refuted, frankly.

In the third chapter, e.g., Harwood writes that there were only three million Jews in Nazi-occupied Europe. Unfortunately, the Nazis' own census of the matter indicated 4.5 million in territory occupied as of December 31, 1941, as well as another 6.5 million in the rest of Europe, with the vast majority of these in Hungary and the Soviet Union — areas that either were in the process of coming under occupation or that would eventually fall under Nazi occupation and the Jews deported in 1944 (i.e., Hungary).

So on that basis alone, the population statistics, Harwood is in disagreement with population statistics gathered at the time.

In the eighth chapter, Harwood says there's no evidence of gas chambers. I would suggest that there is not only eyewitness testimony on the part of a dozen or more people, some of whom are still alive, but there are documents that demonstrate this, as well as forensic examinations conducted at several of the camps, notably Auschwitz and Belzec.

So it would seem that Harwood is wrong on that account also.
Wroclaw
 

Re: Revisionism in History - Holocaust Revisionism

Postby rerevisionist » 26 Oct 2011 03:42

Yes. The whole thing is well known to be a fabrication and I'm not interested in wasting time on it. I realise you personally might have a money-making interest, or propaganda interest, and of course this has been encouraged since about 1945, but it's time to put it to rest.

This site is about connections with 'nuclear weapons', which, if they don't exist, are a purely propagandist construction, largely by Jews, so it's appropriate to discuss implications of the 'Holocaust' fraud here.
User avatar
rerevisionist
Site Admin
 
Posts: 1056
Joined: 18 Mar 2011 11:40

Re: Revisionism in History - Holocaust Revisionism

Postby Wroclaw » 26 Oct 2011 14:01

If you're not interested in discussing it, then why do you post at CODOH?
Wroclaw
 

Re: Revisionism in History - Holocaust Revisionism

Postby rerevisionist » 26 Oct 2011 19:39

I'm interested in the subject, interested in why people like you continue to lie about it, interested in meta-revisionism, interested in the ramifications of the fraud, and so on. But I'm not interested in wasting time.
User avatar
rerevisionist
Site Admin
 
Posts: 1056
Joined: 18 Mar 2011 11:40

Re: Revisionism in History - Holocaust Revisionism

Postby Wroclaw » 26 Oct 2011 20:18

Is there some reason why I was threatened with being banned for saying something about another forum, but you can call me a liar?

You are aware that calling some a liar is an insult, are you not?
Wroclaw
 

Re: Revisionism in History - Holocaust Revisionism

Postby rerevisionist » 28 Oct 2011 19:45

The word 'jerk' was presumably intended by you as an insult to CODOH. The reason you used it was presumably because you're interested in rehashing a lot of old material, msotly lies, about that hoax. I'm not sure if telling the truth about a liar is an insult; I don't suppose there's a precise way to decide.
User avatar
rerevisionist
Site Admin
 
Posts: 1056
Joined: 18 Mar 2011 11:40

Re: Revisionism in History - Holocaust Revisionism

Postby Wroclaw » 28 Oct 2011 21:54

Well, it's a good thing that you don't apply double standards.

Say, you wouldn't have any evidence for your allegation that I'm lying about something, wouldja?
Wroclaw
 

Return to Other Revisionisms, Hyper-Revisionisms & Off-Topic Debates


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest