• National Geographic and the Malformation the the American Mind
|
National Geographic: More than a Century of Pretty Awful Lies by Rae West Dec 2014
Adventure & Discovery? Natural Wonders of the Earth? Human Diversity? Dramatic Pictures? . . . OR . . . Front for American Imperialism? Jewish-Perverted Deceptive Media Output? Fake Sympathies Hiding Viciousness? Censorship?
|
Note: This is an uncompromisingly revisionist piece. It is up to date with most current knowledge, as far as I know; but no doubt far more censored evil-doing will be unearthed in future, particularly concerning remote parts of the world, and events hidden in fogs of obscurity. You may prefer to avoid truths by leaving this site: if so, I hope you will decide, in future, that truth may help you!
National Geographic: More than a Century of Pretty Awful Lies
Image and Reality of the National Geographic
Back to top
Circulation and Membership
1900
first world war [QUOTE THE FIGURE FROM THE PAGE]
1 million members
1939 circ
1949 2 million
|
Overview of the National Geographic's history
Back to top
Start
1914; 1917
1917-1945
After 1945; 'post-war'
US media: new york times on moon landing
time mag and keynes
readers digest
encounter
|
joke about life
Importance of Maps
Back to top
1940 Americas crescent
1951 cover
1951 new map of europe
1969 Palmer EU geography
1972 indians in USA
1995 Maps satellite
Pair of China and tibet maps
|
Tribes and Customs and Work: Human Geography
Back to top
Ads, Promotion: How National Geographic Thrived
Back to top
1940 spam
1951 embarrassment
1972 beechcraft plane
1985 camera
1995 tide watch
|
Photography
dramatic
1998 smog
furry wildlife
underwater unfamiliar
|
Technical Improvements
Entertainment for the Masses
Back to top
Remote history and fossils
Gobekli Tepe stones
april 1989 - swedish ship recovery [cp mary rose, titanic]
|
Wars and Destruction
Gawping at the Universe
Moon Covers - moon 1969 three typical pages [and close up]
more space covers - four inc sept 83, oct 86
---
other moon: 4 pictures; but who took them?
1969
1971
1983
1986
making maps
leg sticking out
69-12 two pix with moved cross hair
6902-241 making a globe
|
National Geographic Boards, Government, and World Domination
Back to top
1940 board list
1965 le may cover le may board
1992 board list at least as in the mag
|
Policy Decisions and Institutional Memory
Comparisons with Official Sources
National Geographic: US/Jewish Hegemony
Back to top
US empire 1965 2 images - both Curtis Le May
VIETNAM -
VIETNAM - 1985 monument x2 / may 1985 'to heal a nation'
March 1990 letters to ed
|
Federal Reserve
Back to top
US Military
Back to top
US Corporations
Back to top
Jews Behind the Scenes, and Their Interests
Back to top
Controlled Opposition
Censorship
Back to top
USA as a Fake Nation
Fed
WW1
USSR and Gulags
3 images 1990 gulag remembered twice and return to the gulag
|
USSR: Experiments on Russians and Others
WW2
Germany and Ike the Kike
Bretton Woods etc
Nukes and spies
nuclear hoax page from bryant
nukes radiation
|
Cold War and wars
Castro marrano jew and cigar 1977
CASTRO'S MOTHER WAS NAMED RUIZ. HE WAS JEWISH. HE WAS EVEN IN SOME HOLLYWOOD B MOVIES.....ONE CALLED.......NO KIDDING.....BEACH BABES. OR SOMETHNG THAT CHEEZY. THIS WAS WHEN HE WAS LA LAWYER...THEN SUDDENLY HE WAS JUNGLE REVOLUTIONARY. AHHAHAH HE'S CONTROLLED OP. THE CUBAN MISSILE CRISIS WAS FAKE. A BOMB NOT ON THE GROUND, WILL NOT CAUSE A MUSHROOM CLOUD...IT WOULD
|
Middle East
december 1972 israel the seventh day
|
Money
Faked Public Concerns
Science frauds
MARS with 3 d specs 1998
endoplasmic reticulum with false color
ENERGY SPECIAL feb 1981 cover plus 2 pages 'in the public interest'
1987 imaging cover
1986 immune system
june 1995 healthy brain
1985 quarks
global warming
|
Decline
Back to top
DECLINE educational media and losing their way
WEBSITE cover designs
WEBSITE online kids channel
|
National Geographic: Conclusions
Back to top
Is it worth reading? cp with left book club: if it still existed, would it be worth reading? Worth reading New York Times? Is it worth reading psychopathic material? Will you miss things if you don't check propaganda? do people who've discontinued reading newspapers on balance lose out?
like the bbc- reform or delete? like the c of e - outmoded? sign of someone who likes pretty pictures and has to be told what to think?
The Press, the military authorities, and many of the American and British legal luminaries considerthat their honour and humanity will be better served by allowing their officers to burn women and children to death than by adopting the standards applied in the Nuremberg Trials. This comes of accepting |Hitler's legacy. - Russell autobiog vol III
To quote from my review: 'The BBC has ALWAYS, ever since its beginning, been purely establishment, in the pragmatic sense of including Jewish influence as 'establishment'. In the 1920s, it permitted no debate on whether WW1 was a mistake - there were no inquiries; in the 1930s it had nothing on Stalin or on Jews or for that matter the Royals; the Spanish Civil War was not reported honestly; in the 1940s it was pure Churchilliana with unsparing anti-German propaganda; in the 1950s it never deviated from pro-American views on Korea, supposed nuclear weapons; the Nuremberg Trials were never queried. In the 1960s there was no honest comment on the Vietnam War. I could go on, including science frauds too. But the simple point is: the BBC has never, ever, been honest.'
I F Stone's 'Hidden History of the Korean War', 1950s: 'A napalm raid hit the village three or four days ago when the Chinese were holding up the advance, and nowhere in the village have they buried their because there is nobody left to do so. This correspondent came across one old woman, the only one who seemed to be left alive, dazedly hanging up some clothes in a blackened courtyard filled with the bodies of four members of her family.' That (only a tiny sample of what happened) was more than fifty years ago.
HTML and content Rae West 6 Nov 2014. Photos from National Geographic scanned under informational copyright rules.