British-Jew Kikipedia says the first genocide of the 20th Century was by Germans in Namibia 1904-1908, not the British genocide of Boers in South Africa 1898-1902. https://en.wikipedia.org/wi...

It also claims a mounted severed head, like the shrunken heads of Jews for shock effect. This event supposedly happened AFTER Germans were attacked and killed. So, if Germans did respond to a hostile force, it was in self-defense. Fighting in self-defense is not genocide. It's weeding out a threat. That's why weeding out Jews qua communists can't be genocide. It is weeding out self-described and avowed thieves and murders with a thieving murderous ideology.

What's more this Namibian genocide was supposedly responding to putting down a wider "uprising." Who was there to record this uprising? Just remember how hot and dry things are in desert conditions. How do these primitives communicate to have a coordinated uprising? How does anyone communicate before the radio? How do Germans hunt these people down before the automobile? The story of the genocide doesn't make sense.

Supposedly, a German named Adolf Luderitz bought land from the tribal chief there who had a German name. https://en.wikipedia.org/wi...

They try to make a fake controversy over what a mile versus a geographic mile is, when the Orange river was a common reference point, in any case. The fake controversy is meant to deny the land deal legitimacy and pretend Germans defrauded the chief. Again, this sounds like fake British history to deny legitimacy to a German land purchase ("colony").

Why would the Africans fight Germans over land they sold? Either they don't comprehend buy and sell, or they didn't care. It's doubtful they cared at all about it. If they can communicate to have an uprising, they can communicate over how some land is now German.

How would they know Germans are there in this sparsely populated land? Is a genocide even needed to scare off a few people? You could only last a mile or two before you overheat. How much of these African genocides are hoax genocides that could not even be achieved given the technical and land conditions for everyone, and are just used as British history to destroy European claims in Africa? Recall that Cecil Rhodes and the British want all of Africa for themselves. If lying achieves their goal, they will lie.

Even the photos of the time are fakes.