Note: I'm not connected in any way with Miles Mathis, and rarely communicate. I wish he'd talk online, but like very many intelligent people, he simply doesn't. I've texted/emailed with many people (in diet, physics, nuclear stuff, education, religions, history, ...) who unfortunately are equally unchatty. And I'm uneasy with the poor quality of one of his supposed supporting sites.

Comment from 2020, probably by Miles Mathis.  Suggesting he can be a rude c*nt.   I found this by chance using alohafind.com, new-to-me secret searcher based on google.   I don't remember what this was about!   However, I'm not a 'spook' and dislike this unsubstantiated claim.

cuttingthroughthefog.com 13 May 2018
[lost comment includes Miles' non-Texan voice. I still don't know how 'Taos' is pronounced.] I commented yesterday, but the comment hasn't appeared, though I found a reference to a wordpress account. I praised Miles' material, notably the political/ 'revolutionary' as in Marx & Lenin et al, but I won't type it again. Now I come to think of it, it's slightly troubling that no official historians seem to be here; surely some must have things to say?

cuttingthroughthefog 13 May 21:13
You say the Talmud has no rhyme or reason. You don't seem to realise what KMcD is claiming, viz that it's a kind of handbook for an aggressive tribe, explaining how to lie, how to deceive 'goyim', what rules to follow as regards laws and Jew policies. I don't think it's phenomenally complex: the methods they've followed are becoming clearer as people study the Talmud - though admittedly there aren't many. Michael A Hoffman II is the best as far as I know, but imho is compromised by actually believing Jewish dross which perverted ancient Christianity. (NB I'd dipped my toe in, only).

May 13, 2018 at 8:29 pm cuttingthroughthefog
Anatoly Fomenko, Christoph Pfister or Edwin Johnson were/are three chronology revisionists (one was 19th C British), and there was a discussion 6 years ago here: https://www.big-lies.org/nuke-lies/www.nukelies.com/forum/hyper-revisionism-large-scale-world-reinterpretations-1-of-7.html . Prompted to have another look, I couldn’t find it had got anywhere. It’s amazing how long these claims and threads can exist in a static way. There just aren’t very many people intellectually equipped. No wonder religions can drag on for millennia. **[nasty reply from Josh...]

May 14, 2018 at 10:46 am cuttingthroughthefog
I wondered if you’re the same Nige who was, at least for a time, friendly with Ivor Catt, and doing your best to draw attention to his multi-chip computer (for air traffic control etc) but which came to nothing? What is very saddening about the attempts at truth-hunting are the vast numbers of people who make no attempts to investigate, for example those who just will not read sites, however much they are recommended. I’m afraid Ivor was that type. Sigh.

cuttingthroughthefog.com May 15, 2018 at 11:58 pm
The entire concept of the ‘hero’, ‘hero-worship’ etc is a concept to delude ordinary people. I think it’s the reason Nietzsche is promoted (similarly with Thomas Carlyle in Britain in 19th century, promoting Cromwell and an obscure abbot). You don’t get Warburgs or Rothschilds etc donning scarlet uniforms and mounting white chargers and leading magnificent actions against the ‘goyim’. They have large, secret numbers and secret policies.

cuttingthroughthefog.com May 16, 2018 at 2:51 am SITE SEARCHER FOR MILES MATHIS—- I’ve included a sitesearcher to allow MM’s files to be located, since nobody else seems interested.
–---
At the risk of being removed by Josh, it’s in my new (but unfinished) file
www.big-lies.org/how-master-race-won-ww2/
–---
Follow the link to Miles Mathis. If someone can let me know that it works for all other sites, I’d be grateful,

cuttingthroughthefog.com May 16, 2018 at 2:34 pm
Josh – Thanks for leaving that link. It’s useful to be able to find papers on Miles’ site, and I recommend it to anyone trying to find any subjects where multiple papers are relevant (e.g. Lenin, Marx, Rosa Luxembourg, etc).
----
My attitude to your piece on Dreyfus is that I suspect it’s well-known to Jews, who endlessly recycle their ‘triumphs’. So I think you’ve just used MM’s methods to write a paper. And it’s a good piece, which ought to be known. It’s therefore possible, you won’t be surprised to hear, that the material on Jews in Russia, Marx and Engels, etc might have been fed by you to MM. I doubt if this is true of eg Venice, Anglesey, Wars of the Roses, Medicis in Europe etc.
_______
My site includes highly important material on cell biology and why modern medicine is empirical and a mess as regards theory. This is mostly from Harold Hillman, now unfortunately dead. If this is outside your range, it’s your problem. It doesn’t mean my site is ‘garbage’. Ditto for many other issues, e.g. the nuke fakes material. The Vietnam War material is little known in the USA, because of Jew censorship. Again, if it’s outside your range, it tells more about you than me. And so on. For example, the salt-in-food issue is extremely important, but if it’s over your head, don’t expect me to be impressed.
----
Incidentally, looking at the bad organisation of this wordpress site, I’m amused you say my site is disorganized. I put as much as I can on the front page, arranged by topics. {Plus note that Mathis' own site is itself just HTML)

@Garrett Derner May 16, 2018 at 6:41 pm on cuttingthroughthefog
Thanks for commenting, though you obviously haven’t begun to read it. But let me comment on Jews in Germany. You say Jews ‘must have liked the culture’ in Germany. I’d suggest they saw Germans as suckers, and battened on to them. The whole social democrat movement in Germany was Jewish. – Jews began to pour into Britain at about the same as they poured into Ellis Island. Hilaire Belloc says it was ‘planned like a military operation’ (not in a sarcastic sense). The ‘Aliens Act’ (early 1900s) was a slow reaction. And Jews in London supported war, not of course in the sense of fighting themselves. – The point you make about German industrial success was often brought up before WW1. (The Act making things from Germany marked ‘Made in Germany’ was part of this). But I’m unsure how serious the argument was: after WW1 Britain was hugely impoverished, and by 1940 of course it was bankrupt, presumably in the liquid assets sense. I suspect the idea that ‘after the war, we’ll make money from reconstruction’ was in the same category as ‘the immigrants will pay our pensions’.

May 17, 2018 at 10:19 am cuttingthroughthefog
Why? – I have a worrying fear that MM may have been corralled by Jews, who feed him a few examples of Jewish ‘triumphs’ of the past, and a few junk US frauds. But not the serious huge frauds: where is MM on Jews in WW2, various genocides in the USSR, ‘US’ bases, Jews in law, Jews in education? Judging by Joss, the Dreyfus Affair is a Jewish secret tradition, fed to MM – and I don’t deny its significance. It may be a sign of internal splits in ‘Jews’ of the sort that are likely whenever a concentrated intense battle has some sort of resolution. Jews have inflamed splits for centuries; the opposite process may well work. For example, there should be a campaign to remove Jewish assets they got through frauds such as the holohoax.

May 17, 2018 at 11:14 am cuttingthroughthefog
Two comments on relativity. [1] The idea of the speed of light as an upper limit is based on the speeding-up of changed particles with an electromagnetic field. No matter how much energy goes into it, the speed of an em field is the upper limit. [2] The emphasis on light in relativity etc is an imported human attitude probably irrelevant to physics. Imagine a dark universe; why should light have any relevance to the positions and movements of objects? (It’s the same mistake as is/was made with the ‘Uncertainty Principle’. The fact that human eyes etc can’t pinpoint a small position doesn’t mean there isn’t a position; it just happens not to be locatable) – My spiffing site has a piece on physics, but if anyone’s interested it’s easy enough to find. I don’t what Josh saying it’s spam, which he couldn’t recognise even on his plate.

May 17, 2018 at 9:42 pm
@'Jared Magneson' [1] I’m talking about light speed as a supposed upper limit. It’s an artefact of their technique. [2] The Uncertainty Principle is a mistake, based on the error of assuming that light, which is important in human perception, is also important in all physics. https://www.big-lies.org/modern-physics-a-fraud/
----
I’m not ‘vehement’ against Josh. He doesn’t seem well-informed, though. And your comment is laughable. I’d be happy to debate any of the topics, if I thought you could understand them.