Atrocities: Publicising Some, to Conceal Others
Rae West 2020-March-27
Use of Atrocities to Distract from Other Jewish Schemes
A short note on this form of distraction. Suggested to me first by considering the part played by Jews such as Ralph Schoenman, Isaac Deutscher, Jean-Paul Sartre, Mark Lane, Noam Chomsky and many others in Bertrand Russell's Vietnam War Crimes Tribunals. Why would they draw attention to war crimes and risk exposing Jews such as Kissinger and Lyndon Johnson?
Russell's own account (
Autobiography, Vol III) includes ‘Chiefly, however, I base my opinions upon the facts reported in the daily newspapers, especially those of the United States [of America]. These reports seem to have been published almost by chance since they appear not to have affected editorial policy.’ Anyone familiar with the absolutely strict censorship of junk like the
New York Times will appreciate the likelihood that the material was bait, or distraction, such as taking attention from Jews and onto non-Jew Americans.
Probably the reason was and is concealment of the parts played by Jews in China, which of course are hidden to this day. I've come to the conclusion that limited reveals of 'American' atrocities in Vietnam were (1) to distract from China, (2) to show whites behave in disgusting ways, something useful to Jews, (3) of course also to hide Jewish thefts and crimes generally.
During the Second World War, a good example is (or may be) the 'Spanish Civil War' with large numbers of atrocities and atrocity stories. I'd guess they distracted from the Jewish Ukrainian famine.
Other examples might include: Wars in India | the US Civil War | Opium Wars | Boer War | Armenia | Ukrainian Famine | Spanish Civil War | Polish-German border | Palestine | Vietnam War | China Famine | southern Africa.
For example, it's possible the US Civil War might have helped Jews in the Far East to cover up opium wars and atrocities, which to this day are little known to American 'scholars'.
The general principle is that Jew networking operates in areas which are separated and have different languages. Europe during the World Wars is a perfect example, with newspapers and radio controlled in each country. Few people in Britain, for example, had a clue about Germany. And with Spain, Italy, France, Poland, and small countries like Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia, and remote countries, hardly known, such as Siberia and BelaRussia (if that was its name), and indeed faked countries such as Czechoslovakia and Yugoslavia, it was simple for Jews to plant stories anywhere.
The fact that the 'Holohoax' stories ever started is proof of the complicity of all influential groups of the 'Allies'.
All this operates in what could be called 'small scale' atrocities. Murders of whites in South Africa, murders of whites in the USA and Europe, murders of non-Jews in eastern Europe during and after the Second World War, are covered up by the Jew-controlled media. Consider how much reporting there was of military material given to 'Communists' (Jews?) in China. And almost all influential people say nothing.
Similarly, in Palestine, the massive parasitism of Jews means they could easily exterminate Palestinians. They prefer to distract from Jews worldwide by controlled misdirecting atrocities.
On a wider scale, here's a comment to me by 'Baron Harris':
The purpose of the great cruelty of the bolshevics could have been preplanned to cause Germany by reasoning to attack the USSR, to make the so-called Jewish Holocaust, and for the USSR to attack Germany in return and thus to make the Holocaust short termed, in order to force Jews to go to Israel. WW1 and WW2 was like the super rich playing chess, to obtain Israel.
HTML Rae West 27 3 2020/ 12 4 2020/ 2 5 2020/ 11 10 2021