mardi 21 janvier 2020

Historical revisionism was a creation of the elite

I became interested in revisionism in the late 1980s. And especially from 1990, when the Fabius-Gayssot law, which banned revisionist opinions, was passed in France. Of course, from that date on, I was convinced that the revisionists were right. If a government bans an opinion so hysterically, it is most certainly true. But finding books on the subject was almost impossible because of the ban. As a result, I was only able to discover revisionist writings in 1996, through the Internet, by going to the famous Aaargh site. And from the very first articles, I received confirmation that the Holocaust was a pure invention.

Of course, this very quickly led me to become interested in the career of the most famous revisionists, including Faurisson. From the outset, two or three things made me slightly twitch. At the time, not being in the extreme conspiracy, I let pass this strange information. But as I became more and more conspirationist, and thinking back on this information a few years ago, I had more and more doubts. Especially since I had discovered in the early 2000s that many of the new stars of revisionism were in fact agents.

Over the last 3 or 4 years, I began to think that the first dissident movements had probably been set up by the authorities to launch conspirationnism among the masses. There, I began to think that revisionism was one of these movements.

But since I did not see too much use for revisionism for the masters of the world outside of that, since I was thinking about other things and since Faurisson was still a monument in my mind, I had left it at that; even if my doubts were becoming more and more important.

But, since I understood, a few months ago, that the Israel project must be a racist pro-white project and that a large part of the Jews of the diaspora will most likely be deported to Israel before and during World War III, there, the role of revisionism, in addition to participating in the rise of the conspirationnist movement, became very clear to me. Its primary goal was to raise "anti-Semitism" in order to send Jews from the diaspora to Israel. It confirmed that revisionism was indeed a project of the elite.

This was very difficult to understand for a very long time as also because, until about 10 years ago, the revisionist movement remained a niche trend, something known only to a few ultra-conspirationnists. So it was hard to think that it could be of any use to the elite in any way. It's only in the last few years that we feel that revisionism is starting to come out of its ghetto and that we can glimpse its role.

And of course, the Fabius-Gayssot law was made on purpose to advertise revisionism. It was not made to bury it, but to spread it. A law made to ban a historical research movement is a clear signal that this movement is right and that the government is trying to hide the truth. Once again, for 30 years, the purpose of this law did not emerge, because it remained a small group. So the law did not seem to help it at all. But it's becoming clear, now that revisionism is becoming more widespread, that the goal was this. It just took 20 years for it to become clear. The thing was meant to act with delay. So the goal was unsuspected.

That's why the extermination evidence is ridiculous on every level. Because Hitler was an agent of the elite, if the elite had wanted the Holocaust to look real, they would have had no problem making it look real. Hitler would then have had thousands of false documents produced to prove that an extermination project was being carried out. The German authorities could have put thousands of bodies of German and Russian soldiers killed in combat in pits near concentration camps; and even civilians dead in hospitals and without families to bury them. They could have made private videos of Hitler declaring his extermination intentions to his trusted ministers. All this would have been "discovered" by totally "independent" observers. And then no one could have doubted the reality of the Holocaust. If the elite did not do this, it was because they wanted people to realize the deception as soon as they looked closely at the evidence of the Holocaust. They wanted the lie of the Holocaust to be exposed and many people would end up not believing it.

It's like the Islamist attacks right now, they have to be staged and the deception often has to be completely grotesque for many people to understand that it is all false and to switch to the conspirationnist side.

In fact, even assuming that Hitler was not an elite agent, it would have been possible for the victors to create false documents, to have apparently reliable, credible and neutral witnesses, and thus to produce seemingly irrefutable evidence. If they did not do so, it is because they wanted us to find out that this holocaust story is bogus. And, of course, since it wasn't ordinary people who were going to dare to ask these questions, they put agents to do the job. In any case, the elite obviously would not have wanted ordinary people to question the lie. It could have been dangerous, because they could have asked themselves embarrassing questions (as I do now). So it had to be agents who did the job.

As the document is very long, i put it here in PDF format. And since the translation will take some times, I put it here first in french. The english version will follow.

Robert Faurisson, très probablement un agent [NB https://drive.google.com/file/d/19AMny27r3lqnD8zi_MgHq8WLxmehEJoT/view   is an unusual link, and may be changed or not work]

My English translation of Hexzane527 on Faurisson and revisionism (4 Aug 2020):—
Robert Faurisson as probable agent—entire revisionist project as an elite scam, with ultimate aim to make Jews unpopular, so they leave.