Big-lies.org

Thoughts on Selective Prosecutions pushed by Jews — by Raeto Collin West — 18 December 2022

It's no surprise that I never received an apology, or any information about the groups responsible for the absurd police caution and interview.

Obviously there's a question of the decision by (in this case) the 'Crown Prosecution Service' not to proceed, and the length of time over the decision. And what other activities they may have undertaken.

I'd like to mention here the case of an investigation into Lady Renouf, which, was cut short after a long preliminary. Banker, Model, and Jewish Spy which is online in several places. The version linked here is the oldest I could find, from January 14, 2021. It looks at Hermann Abs, described as Germany's equivalent of Bernard Baruch, and close friend of Sir Frank Renouf, who was another banker. That article is in semi-revisionist style, omitting evidence of the sort trawled from Internet by Miles Mathis. But of course it's obvious enough that Jews will hold back from drawing attention to their behaviour, at least as long as public opinion has any power.

In my own case I have no idea either why the police turned up, or why the case wasn't pursued—if it was unimportant, why start the thing at all, unless as a warning? I don't know, but can speculate: maybe the nuclear issues and related problems over wars and electricity supply were sensitive? Maybe the book and media reviews were near the bone? Maybe I was too scholarly—Alison Chabloz was kind enough to say so. Maybe they're just mad—a suggestion from Simon Sheppard.

Note added 1 June 2024: It occurs to me that Keir Starmer's department may have been part of this. Perhaps Starmer quailed before my lightning responses. Maybe his Jewish wife started it, relying on her slow goy hubby to take her side. Perhaps there's a Jewish rule-book of advice for handling such situations—a little treat, perhaps, distasteful, but of course putting the 'chosen' first. Who knows?