NEW DEMOCRACY ACTION
See above. The above group appears to know about the corruption in our legal system. It points out that we are now, since 1974, victims of Justinian/Roman Law - a feudal legal system by which the State is always right. This means effectively that if the Prime Minister is found to have accepted a bribe and deposited it in the Seychelles he will have immunity from prosecution. However we know that our legal system has been seriously corrupt since 1961 or earlier and was effectively in the pockets of the multinationals at that time. Our view is that we have international feudalism in the form of multinational industrial/financial complexes. Control is exercised by the Bilderberg Council and not by the hangers on who attend Bilderberg Group meetings. Bilderberg aims to control the resources of the world and make serfs of the peoples of the world. The State is always right provided it works to a Bilderberg agenda.
Forming a new group of malcontents is not the answer to the evils of Bilderberg. Can we suggest again that the Campaign For A Fair Hearing be given the lead in opposing systemic corruption in our legal system? We must act as one unit and whoever takes the lead must be given support. Will you Litigants-In-Person please try to accept the obvious: you are never going to win a case while acting on your own no matter how watertight your case may be. Your MP will be unable to assist you primarily because he/she would not be an MP if the party did not subscribe to Bilderberg principles. Why do you think our public services are being privatised and, as often as not, taken over by foreign conglomerates? Why do you think ordinary people are being denuded of their property by a corrupt legal system? Why do you think Blair will not tolerate dissent?
***BILDERBERGBLAIRBILDERBERGBROWNBILDERBERGSTRAWBILDERBERGIRVINEBILDERBERGWOOLFEBILDERBERGBINGHAM***
PROFESSOR OF GAY STUDIES
Professor Greg Woods has been appointed Professor of Gay and Lesbian Studies at Nottingham Trent University. We thought that "gay" included lesbians. Woods states "It is an uphill struggle to attract students to the subject. Things need to change at the school level and pupils who are gay given more opportunity to come out and not be derided".
Most young people go through a phase when strong friendships develop between people of the same sex. What is this government thinking about? Should we have a course of heterosexual studies while there are still more straight people than homosexuals? What about a Professor of Paedophilia? Could not the resources be devoted to education, education and education? Will the time arrive when all human beings are created in a test tube?
***BILDERBERGBLAIRBILDERBERGBROWNBILDERBERGSTRAWBILDERBERGIRVINEBILDERBERGWOOLFEBILDERBERGBINGHAM***
DAME BARBARA MILLS AND GEOFFREY S-----N
This Director of Public Prosecutions is no worse than her kerb-crawling predecessor. She has just been ordered by the Court of Appeal to explain why the Crown Prosecution Service withheld around sixty exhibits from the defence in York Crown court. This resulted in an innocent man spending 11 years in prison and being beaten up for sexual offences. She has been informed that the CPS is withholding a key document in the case against Mr S-----n in Warrington Magistrates Court where the charge is one of causing criminal damage in the amount of £5.00. The arresting officer put the amount at £2.00 but the desk sergeant told him "You'd better make it £5.00". The missing document was issued by a High Court judge who stated that Mr S-----n had been present at the hearing giving rise to the document. Mr S-----n's hospital record shows that he was a hospital in-patient at the time of the hearing. It would be improper for us to comment on the merits of the police case or to explain what is behind it. It would appear to be an attempt to legitimise a court order that was unlawful and which forms the basis of Mr S------'s case against the Lord Chancellor and others and his defence against the criminal damage charge. We consider it to be in the public interest to publish our view to prevent yet another miscarriage of justice.
When one is being victimised by the police, particularly in the Manchester area, the victim would benefit from an organisation like Nation of Islam, which concentrated the minds of the police and the chairman of the public enquiry into the murder of Stephen Lawrence. The founder of the Nation of Islam was Louis Farrakhan, a prohibited immigrant because he has stated that the Jewish religion is a "dirty religion". We don't agree with Louis. We would say that, like the Masonic brotherhood, it is not a religion but a racist organisation that believes its members to be superior to every other individual on God's earth. If that isn't racism what is?
Mills is believed to be joining Marks & Spencers. We have no complaint about that as long as they keep her in the vegetable section.
***BILDERBERGBLAIRBILDERBERGBROWNBILDERBERGSTRAWBILDERBERGIRVINEBILDERBERGWOOLFEBILDERBERGBINGHAM***
E-mail dated 28 June to Anne Campbell,MP, from Suzon Forscey-Moore of the Campaign for A Fair Hearing.
<< Thank you for sending the response from C W V Everett. I did not think the Court Service would come up with a justification.
I continue to be concerned about the secret briefings for two reasons: (1) Since the briefings are supplied by a government department, presumably to cut costs, and have been received by the judiciary without complaint, the judicial system is, ipso facto, politicised; further, how (2) does depriving litigants of what is arguably the most important document in their cases square with Lord Irvine's recent statement, *We believe in freedom of information*?
This is a serious matter, not least to the more than 600 litigants in person who go to the Court of Appeal each year. As I may have indicated in an earlier e-mail, their failure rate in 1994-45was 96%.
Given that it is a criminal offence to deprive people of an entitlement (and it is no defence that it was done in good faith in the belief that some valid public purpose was being served), I would like to have a word from Lord Irvine himself that he has not been kept in the dark by civil servants regarding this practice.
I would be most grateful if you would ask him to acknowledge that he is personally aware of the provision of case summaries. Yours, Suzon Forscey-Moore.>>
Reply << Thank you for your message. I am sending a copy to the Lord Chancellor and I will let you know when I hear from him. Anne Campbell, MP >>
Comment:- Surely this practice of secret briefing is of fundamental constitutional importance and should have been raised on the floor of the Commons. We never write to Court Services and we never open letters from Court Services because, in the past, we found them to be a economical with the truth - apologists for a corrupt legal system. Think of the savings that could be achieved by bringing judges into line and dispensing with these overpaid liars. The briefing of judges by politicians is not done to save costs but to pervert the course of justice as in the Scriven case. The Cardinal is well aware of the practice but has so far kept his signature off letters admitting it. The document is only important to litigants in that it lets them know that the outcome of their cases is prejudged and has nothing to do with the merits. More about Irvine follows.
***BILDERBERGBLAIRBILDERBERGBROWNBILDERBERGSTRAWBILDERBERGIRVINEBILDERBERGWOOLFEBILDERBERGBINGHAM***
EURO MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT
We thank our anonymous reporter of the failure of British Euro MPs to look after British interests. In this case a British company is going out of business while two European companies in the same business are setting up factories in the UK. Euro MPs are not there to protect UK interests. Their first priority is to collect their salaries and expenses and any other benefits that come their way. It does not matter who owns the means of manufacture or where the work is carried out. The European companies will acquire the British company. This is referred to as economy of size. We will finish up with one or two multinational companies in accordance with the Bilderberg plan for world exploitation. Are you aware that when the public water utilities were privatised the majority of the water companies were taken over by two French companies, which were found to be responsible for 80% of the corruption in France? Their method was to bribe senior politicians and political parties. Another water company was taken over by an American company that is in thrall to the Teamsters Union. Grand Prix and tobacco?
***BILDERBERGBLAIRBILDERBERGBROWNBILDERBERGSTRAWBILDERBERGIRVINEBILDERBERGWOOLFEBILDERBERGBINGHAM***
THE BENT COPPERS AND BEAKS OF MANCHESTER
During the past week there have been several cases botched in the Manchester District Registry. There is also an unsubstantiated report allegedly picked up from police radio that the court is being investigated. A few weeks back Cardinal Irvine paid a secret visit to the court - secret until Geoffrey Scriven spied him. He then scurried away. Now we learn that Manchester businessman, Kevin Taylor. Was paid approximately £6 million in costs and damages by Greater Manchester Police. You may recall that John Stalker, Deputy Chief Constable, was getting close to showing that there was a shoot-to-kill policy in Ulster. He was removed from the case because of his friendship with Kevin Taylor, allegedly an active criminal. It was general knowledge that Stalker, a Roman Catholic, was being targeted by Freemasonry. It goes without saying that there was a shoot-to-kill policy and that there were innocent victims of the policy. Can you wonder at the outrage of the Nationalists against Orangemen who are part of the Masonic set up? Who do you think is responsible for burning down Catholic Chapels in Ulster? Why has there been no apology yet for Bloody Sunday? How was it the John Prescott was cleared of any wrongdoing in Hull within one week when it takes months to enquire into bloody Sunday where all the evidence is on record?
***BILDERBERGBLAIRBILDERBERGBROWNBILDERBERGSTRAWBILDERBERGIRVINEBILDERBERGWOOLFEBILDERBERGBINGHAM***
GEOFFREY ROBINSON - PAYMASTER GENERAL
This man is so close to Phoney Blair that he lets Blair use his home in Italy. We are not concerned about his relations with other women besides his wife or the fact that he was left millions by a Belgian widow. Nor are we interested in his adventures with Coventry City or his offshore trusts. What we want to know is to what extent he was involved in the crimes being committed by that great friend of Israel, Robert Maxwell. Robinson received £150,000 as director of a Maxwell company and then a payment of £1 million in cash a few months before Maxwell's murder/suicide. If Maxwell gave someone £1 million for safekeeping that could be a motive for murder. Surely Robinson is not a fit person to be an MP let alone Paymaster General. It also raises questions about Blair and indeed about the whole ethos of New Labour which is more in tune with the international criminality of the Bilderberg Council than with democracy.
***BILDERBERGBLAIRBILDERBERGBROWNBILDERBERGSTRAWBILDERBERGIRVINEBILDERBERGWOOLFEBILDERBERGBINGHAM***
THE CARDINAL CRAPS AGAIN
This accident-prone galoot has a neck of brass. His first wife now lives in Canada putting the Atlantic Ocean between him and her. Would that we could do likewise. He seduced Donald Dewar's wife and a second divorce resulted. We don't know of any other conquests but men who have it away with a friend's wife are bound to be of a horny disposition. The cardinal reminds us of the pelican because his beak can hold more than his belly can. Let us not be too unkind. He has been involved in at least two divorces. Yet last week he was lecturing "Relate" on the importance of stable marriages. Mind you he couldn't care less about marriage but he does care about the enormous cost of divorce actions to the Legal Aid Fund. If he were to look into the merits of individual divorces he would find that most of the costs and many of the divorces are caused by the greed of solicitors.
Ann Abrahams, the Legal Services Ombudsman, states that there have been complaints against one in three solicitors. We would put the figure at nine out of ten. Many victims don't waste time complaining to the Office for the Supervision of Solicitors and many are not aware that they have grounds for complaint. We think it appropriate the Director of OSS, Peter Ross, is being considered for the post of DPP - a worthy successor to Barbara Mills and Alan Green.
Let's go back to the Cardinal who is in favour of maintaining the jury system and who is pushing for a Freedom of Information Act. Derry should start his freedom of information by letting litigants see copies of his secret briefings of judges. Juries give defendants an improved chance of justice but even they can be misled. We remember a man in Armley Prison, Leeds, who was charged with burglary because his driving licence had been found on the floor of the premises that had been burgled. The driving licence was listed in the inventory of his possessions at the time of his arrest. A jury has just convicted a man of the brutal murder of his foster child. The judge told him he had been convicted on the strongest evidence. The forensic scientist stated that there would have been no case if he had not found minute spots of blood on the convicted man's clothing. We believe the pathologist but we doubt whether the spots of blood got onto the clothing at the time of the murder. When the police think they have the murderer, incriminating evidence of some sort will surely follow as night follows day. In spite of all the reported miscarriages of justice the news media have been quick to decide that the convicted man was convicted on the evidence.
***BILDERBERGBLAIRBILDERBERGBROWNBILDERBERGSTRAWBILDERBERGIRVINEBILDERBERGWOOLFEBILDERBERGBINGHAM***
Published by J M Todd, Misbourne Farmhouse, Amersham Road, Chalfont St Giles, Bucks. HP8 4RU
Per pro Vomit. No copyright. Tel/Fax 01494 871204. E-mail <
avengers@vomit.demon.co.uk >