VOMIT 21/98

Victims Of Masonic Ill-Treatment http://www.vomit.demon.co.uk 23 May 1998

HORSEFERRY MAGISTRATES COURT, VICTORIA, LONDON

Alexander Baron goes on trial here on Tuesday 26 May at 10 a.m. He is currently in Brixton Prison. His record shows that he won a libel action against a gutter magazine and obtained a "not guilty" verdict on a charge of defrauding the Benefits Agency. He alleges that the fraud charge was initiated by a Benefits Agency woman whose sexual advances he repelled. His current charges are related to a letter that he sent to another woman who divulged the contents to the Benefits woman and caused her distress. Baron is accused of causing the distress. He is also accused of having made a threatening telephone call to a potential witness - the same Benefits woman with the sexual appetite. This he denies. He accuses two members of Scotland Yard’s Fraud Squad of framing him. There was no impediment to a copper’s nark making a threatening telephone call? We are inclined to believe Baron because some policemen will not let go when they lose a case and one of the Fraud Squad officers is known to us. He is the one who leaked the information about drugs to policemen who were promoting the drugs trade. Note that we have only one side of the story but we publish it because our experience tells us that Baron has little chance of a fair hearing or fair judgement whatever the merits of the prosecution case. We have experience also of Magistrates Courts.

Note that Sir Paul Condon is not meeting with much success with his "significant minority."

QUEEN’S BENCH DIVISION OF THE HIGH COURT, STRAND, LONDON

Two disparate cases in which Geoffrey Scriven issued writs firstly against Lords Irvine, Goff and Woolf and later against the Treasury Solicitor and one of his staff named John Evans were heard together in chambers by Master Turner. The Master who acted for 3 years as assessor to Lord Woolf’s "Access to Jutice" group struck out both cases and gave Mr Scriven five days to appeal against his order after stating that his judgement would have to be posted to the parties. Mr Scriven’s appeal is to be heard at or after 10.30 a.m. Thursday 4 June 1998.

On Thursday 21 May 1998 Justice Douglas Brown heard Mr Scriven’s case against Manchester solicitors and counsel and cleared the way for the case to go directly to the Court of Appeal. The judge drew Mr Scriven’s attention to his undertaking not to criticise the judges with the implication that if Mr Scriven did appeal he would be imprisoned for contempt of court in violating an undertaking given to the court. Mr Scriven pointed out that he had given the undertaking under duress and that Evans, LJ, had found that he had acted with admirable motives and intent. Further Mr Scriven said that he respected judges who complied with their judicial oath but was not prepared to keep quiet about judges who perverted the course of justice. Mr Scriven also asked how the Lord Chancellor knew that the Attorney General was going to start committal proceedings months before the Attorney General made the decision to do so. Justice Douglas Brown came from the same chambers as Counsel Sonia Gal who is primarily responsible for the matters that have caused hardship for Gerald Scriven and the exposure of serious judicial malpractice.

It would appear that there is something grievously wrong about the manner in which the courts are treating Mr Scriven. Serious offences committed by senior judges and by the Lord Chancellor are being covered up. We would remind you that Lord Irvine visited the Manchester District Registry on Friday 15 May 1998 – another first for the Cardinal. Note that it was Mr Scriven who first learned that the Lord Chancellor’s department was secretly briefing Appeal Court judges. We ask again how any judge whose career prospects are dictated by the Lord Chancellor can hear a case against the Lord Chancellor. The Lord Chancellor himself has informed an MP that if there is the slightest possibility of a conflict of interest a judge must stand himself down. As we all know the Lord Chancellor cannot tolerate criticism. If Mr Scriven succeeds in his action the three Lords will be impeached by Parliament. Now let us see how the lofty Cardinal deals with his problem. Should he do a Gerald Bull on Geoffrey Scriven with the help of MI5/MI6?

BLACK HUMOUR AND THE HOLOCAUST

Chris Smith, the Heritage Secretary, is prancing about the Cannes film festival while drawing his ministerial pay. Poor man! Even if he were heterosexual he would have difficulty finding a partner. Why not try Cannes? The shirtlifters are applauding an Italian film that depends upon the Holocaust for its humour. It has been applauded not on account of the quality of the film but presumably because it will make money. A Jew won the National Lottery. When asked for his reaction he replied "I prayed to God giving Him thanks and I asked Him to forgive Adolf Hitler". When asked why Hitler should be forgiven the Jew replied "Hitler had the winning numbers tattooed on my wrist."

Bill Clinton is not a Jew. He states proudly that he is an Irish Protestant. He was sending a signal to the Ulster Unionists at the request of two-faced Blair. "Vote ‘yes’ to the peace agreement. We guarantee that we will keep the Fenian bastards in their place below the stairs". Every night Clinton prays and asks the Good Lord to set up a blow-job for him next day.

Does anyone know what religion Blair has adopted this week? Bilderberg Jew, perhaps? He is due a meeting with the Bilderberg Group soon.

THE UK PERFIDY AND SIERRA LEONE

Blair refers to this scandal as a minor brouhaha while British weaponry is still being used to kill thousands of civilians whom the corrupt and lying President Kabah saw as a threat to his absolute power. If there is a full investigation we may find a better explanation for Blair’s strange behaviour at Christmas when he attempted a secret visit to the Seychelles and a stopover in an African state.

Note that the DTI had dropped proceedings against Gerald James and three fellow directors. In our view this casts further doubt on the integrity of Vice Chancellor Scott. The Sierra Leone enquiry, unlike Scott, is to be conducted in private. Read on and you may find a possible explanation for this.

Tim Spicer, now of Sandline, has a track record that shows he has been acting for big business (Bilderberg again) to acquire the natural resources of what he would term backward former colonial countries. The Papuans arrested him and imprisoned him. His paymasters arranged for his release. In 1995 he was supporting the military junta (Strasser) in Sierra Leone. The junta, to its credit, refused to play ball and sell the country’s assets in return for the enrichment of its leader. Kabah was prepared to sell his people down the river. Spicer is a mercenary with all that that implies. He provides armed support in return for money. Kabah had to pay for Spicer’s intervention. Before the Bilderbergers would provide finances and in view of Spicer’s track record they had to be assured that the intervention would succeed. MI6, the SAS, the MOD and the Foreign Office carried out an assessment of the Sierra Leone situation. They visited Sierra Leone. Yes! The British Government (without any Government Minister knowing anything about it) effectively employed Spicer. Was Spicer seconded from the army?

Here is how the money was arranged to pay for Spicer’s services and the weapons of war. Rackesh Saxena signed an agreement with Kabah whereby Saxena would pay Kabah 10 million US dollars in exchange for mineral rights (titanium and diamonds) in Sierra Leone. The deal was signed in London at St James Court Hotel and in the Commonwealth Secretariat offices. Saxena’s mother who is a senior official at the Commonwealth Secretariat, assisted with the deal. She is in Canada now assisting Saxena in his attempts to avoid extradition to Thailand where it is alleged that he committed a multi-million pound bank fraud. Spicer was present during the negotiations and the signing of the contract.

Kasbah’s liberation army comprised mainly Nigerian troops who have and are committing the most horrific atrocities against civilians including opposition politicians who suffer "necklace deaths". A burning rubber tyre is hung round their heads. Note that British arms are being used to murder civilians in Nigeria, in Indonesia, in Sierra Leone and in Ulster.

Why should the UK government behave in this way? As we see it Blair and company have no choice just as they had no choice when Brown handed over control of interest rates to the Bank of England without consulting anyone. The rot started when the late John Smith and Gordon Brown met the Bilderberg Group about ten years ago. Neil Kinnock, the Welsh Windbag, was supposed to become Prime Minister but he blew it with his "We’re aaaaaw right" at Sheffield. Boyo was compensated with a well-paid job for life as a European Commissioner.

-o-o-o-

NEW DEMOCRACY POLITICS (NDP) & GANDALF DEFENDANTS CAMPAIGN (GDC)

We have no quarrel with the aims of these two groups. NDP (ph/fax 01246 555713) wants to tackle imperfections in the political/legal/fiscal systems while GDC (ph 01442 240256) appears to be concerned about animal liberation and the environment. Both, in different ways, are looking for money. Both are going nowhere fast. Don’t talk to us about Amnesty International, Liberty, Justice, Charter 88, the Freedom Association, People Concern at Work and any other charity. A body that will curb the greed and dishonesty of the people who run charities should replace the Charity Commissioners. We are making out a cheque for £20.00 payable to "A Fair Hearing". It is time the Davids sacrificed part of their egos and helped to form one organisation to oppose the Goliath of state terrorism. Can we begin by deciding the location of the headquarters of such an organisation? Cambridge? London? Birmingham?

-o-o-o-

JONATHAN AITKEN AND THE SAUDI NURSES

We write from memory and apologise for any inaccuracies. On 21 May two nurses released from prison by the Saudi authorities landed in the UK. That same day Jonathan Aitken, the friend of Saudi princes, was charged with perjury and attempting to pervert the course of justice.

Aitken commenced libel proceedings against the Guardian and Granada TV. He was protected by the judicial shield and the sword of prevarication. He was thoroughly disgraced. The judge referred the case to the police with a view to proceedings for perjury and perverting the course of justice. The case against Aitken appeared to have been well established by the libel case but the enquiry by the police appeared to be going nowhere until one of our major companies (GEC or British Aerospace?) appointed Aitken as its man in Saudi. Why should a respectable British company appoint a completely discredited Aitken to even clean its lavatories? Aitken was clearly still a friend of the Saudis who had benefited from Aitken’s hospitality in the UK in a manner that even Saudi royalty could not reciprocate in Saudi Arabia due to its regulations regarding sins of the flesh. For reasons that have still to be explained the job offer to Aitken was withdrawn. Was one of Blair’s capitalist friends unwilling to let Aitken have Mark Thatcher type commissions on arms sales? Was one of Blair’s beggars on horseback on his way to the Seychelles?

The Blair mobsters are anxious lest the two nurses spill the beans about the Saudis. One of the nurses had a dormant charge of theft awakened – a charge that probably played a major part in the fabrication of the case against her by the Saudi police. Surely the despotic rulers of Saudi Arabia would not want their favourite son charged with serious offences. Add to that the fact that Aitken might spill the beans about the shady armaments world. The case against Aitken is not proven but it is difficult to see how, in all the circumstances, he is likely to have a fair hearing in open court before an independent and impartial tribunal. Either he will be as guilty as hell and be effectively acquitted or his guilt will not be proved beyond reasonable doubt or he will be innocent and found guilty. Anything can happen in a UK court given that the political heads of the judiciary and the prosecution are empowered to influence and do influence the outcome of both civil and criminal cases. In short our legal system is no better than that of Saudi Arabia. After all our policemen force people to confess to crimes they have not committed. We remind you of the Birmingham Six and the Glasgow Ice Cream murders. Add to this that Blair exhibits all the despotic traits of a Saudi king with a hypersensitive Cardinal as his mentor. Touch the Cardinal’s wallpaper and, drunk or sober, He will have your hands cut off. We wonder what the Cardinal and the gagging Attorney General and their minions have in store for Geoffrey Scriven, Royston Leicester and Gerald and Eva Adshead – all victims of the unacceptable behaviour of the judiciary. There are signs that we too are going to be victims again.

Published by J M Todd, Misbourne Farmhouse, Amersham Road, Chalfont St Giles, Bucks. HP8 4RU