REPORTS

Paul Talbot-Jenkins, BSc(Hons), phone/fax 01572 812042, wrote to Cock Robin Cook on 20 May 1998 advising Cookie on how to handle the abuse by Michael Howard over Cookie's involvement in Sierra Leone. Paul mentions for example that Howard, with the many-husbanded wife, was involved in the sale of the Matrix Churchill company to the Iraqis. Paul finishes his letter as follows <<There is only one reason for the debate over arms to Sierra Leone - money…………..Where is our Bill of Rights? It was a Labour government that repealed the Magna Carta in 1969!>>

There is only one reason for being an MP -money. The Labour Party knows a lot more about the scoundrels in the Tory party and amongst its own ranks than Paul does. The first priority is to make sure that MPs do not kill off the geese that lay the golden eggs. Forget about the play-acting in the House of Commons. The Labour government also repealed the Act requiring the registration of Masons with the "Clerk of the Peace". Cock Robin's reply to Paul's letter, dated 9 July, was as follows. <<Thank you for your letter regarding Sierra Leone dated 20 May 1998 to Mr Cook to which I have been asked to reply. I apologise for the delay. Your comments have been noted, Yours sincerely, Nicky Grimwood,>> We would like to point out that there is no truth in the rumour that Cherie Blair will be the next Lord Chancellor and will wear a diamond tiara instead of a wig - courtesy De Beers and the Bilderberg Council - for services rendered in Sierra Leone. We have no further news on Cock Robin because a Labour MP objected to the line of questioning and the committee went into secret session. Here's to open government trumpeted by His Excellency the Right Honourable Prime Minister, Windbag Blair.

Paul, as area representative of "FAME", also writes to Chris Mullin, MP, about the apparent failure of the Home Affairs Committee to nail Freemasonry. There is also a reference to a false record with the Land Registry and Brother Roger Browne, a Masonic solicitor with Daltons. Our experience has been that the Land Registry is an organisation set up to streamline the swindling of the unwary out of their property. Its Chief Executive, Dr Stuart Hill, either does not know his arse from his elbow or is as bent as a common criminal. We cannot comment on the dishonest solicitor other than to say the use of the word "dishonest" is superfluous when applied to solicitors.

Chris Mullin was handed the poisoned chalice when he became chairman of the Home Affairs Committee dominated by Labour Yes Men. He had the choice of refusing the chairmanship and risking deselection or taking it and making the best of it. We have heard nothing yet about the new judges who are Masons and we probably never will hear anything but Chris did expose the scandalous behaviour of Greater Manchester Police in the Kevin Taylor/John Stalker frame-up. However we listened with disbelief to his justification for Gordon Brown accepting an invitation and flying to America to make a speech about European Monetary Union. This raises doubts about Chris Mullin. He should have kept quiet instead of giving Bilderberg Brown a veneer of respectability. The sooner Ken Livingstone becomes Prime Minister the better. His teeth must have grated if he listened to Chris Mullin.

In a long letter setting out the history of Masonry and its relationship with religion and explaining how Paul has been a victim there are plugs for Paul's own case and an offer to supply at a cost of £30.00 a compact disc that will "destroy Freemasonry". The CD will be available from September 1998 by writing to FAME at Home Farm, Main Street, Greetham, OAKHAM, Leicestershire LE15 7NJ. We prefer to make a donation to "A Fair Hearing" (address above) and are accordingly sending a cheque for £20.00 this week made payable to "A Fair Hearing".

***BILDERBERGBLAIRBILDERBERGBROWNBILDERBERGSTRAWBILDERBERGIRVINEBILDERBERGWOOLFEBILDERBERGBINGHAM***

HOLY MOSES! QUEEN TO ABDICATE IN FAVOUR OF THE CARDINAL?

We have reported how Geoffrey Scriven took legal action against Lords Woolf, Irvine and Goff and against the Treasury Solicitor. No judge was competent to hear the case on account of a conflict of interest. That did not deter Mr Justice (Holy) Moses the man who, as prosecuting counsel, was bent on sending innocent men to jail by concealing defence evidence behind Public Interest Immunity Certificates in the Matrix Churchill Case. Following Lord Woolf's statement that all hearings should take place in open court wherever possible Moses adjourned the hearing at 10.30 a.m. until an open court became available.

The open court hearing did not take place until 5.45 p.m. when the court was closed. Geoffrey Scriven had nowhere to turn except to the Queen because the Lord Chancellor was his opponent and the Prime Minister is far too busy with his propaganda to deal with matters of importance. Both Mr Scriven and Terence Sherriff-Geary wrote to the Queen complaining. Until recently correspondents would receive a courteous letter from one of the Queen's private secretaries. The Lord Chancellor having taken on a Cardinal's role has now promoted himself to be above the Queen. Mr J Rose of the Lord Chancellor's Customer Service Unit replied on behalf of the Queen. It was the usual rubbish that comes from Customer Service Units throughout the legal system and beyond. What an insult to the Queen. This is surely a step towards abolishing the monarchy. Arise King Derry, ye big heidet galoot!

***BILDERBERGBLAIRBILDERBERGBROWNBILDERBERGSTRAWBILDERBERGIRVINEBILDERBERGWOOLFEBILDERBERGBINGHAM***

MANCHESTER HIGH COURT MAFIA AGAIN

On 15 July Joan Craig appeared before a judge named Harrison in Manchester District Registry. Joan called Harrison a crook and one of her supporters challenged Harrison to find all her supporters in contempt of court. The judge and opposition counsel looked "sheepish". We refrain from naming the man who made the challenge lest Blair and Irvine have him targeted by MI5. For the telephone number of MI5 Dirty Tricks Department contact the Observer. We published the number some time ago.

***BILDERBERGBLAIRBILDERBERGBROWNBILDERBERGSTRAWBILDERBERGIRVINEBILDERBERGWOOLFEBILDERBERGBINGHAM***

MASONS AND MI5 IN WARRINGTON MAGISTRATES COURT

See the preceding two items. This is the Manchester Mafia again at work protecting Geoffrey Scriven's opponents Lords Irvine, Lord Woolf and Lord Goff. As reported this is a case about criminal damage amounting to £5 after the desk sergeant told the arresting officer to increase the amount from £2. At the last hearing the magistrates ordered that a pre-trial review would take place on 17 July 1998 and that the prosecution had to provide Mr Scriven with documents and a tape of his police interview. This was important because the transcript of the interview was inaccurate and the police had unlawfully prevented Mr Scriven's Mackenzie Friend from entering the interview room. Mr Scriven turned up in court with several witnesses and his Mackenzie Friend.

There were three magistrates and a clerk named Hayes. The prosecutor was anonymous. A Mason, amongst Mr Scriven's witnesses, did a reconnaissance of the court and told Mr Scriven that he was about to face Masons whom he recognised. When the Mackenzie Friend tried to join Mr Scriven Hayes unlawfully barred him. When he protested to the Magistrates Hayes asked the Magistrates to have him ejected from the Court. The presiding magistrate did as bid. When Mr Scriven offered up, to the magistrates, information against the Chief Constable and the DPP, showing that the prosecution was malicious the Magistrates, on the advice of Hayes, refused the documents. Mr Scriven informed the Magistrates that this was a pre-trial review and that the documentation was relevant in determining whether there was a case to answer and whether the case was triable by jury in the Crown Court. Hayes was in contempt of court by stating that there would be no pre-trial review and that the case was going for trial in the same court on Monday 14 September 1998. Hayes refused to provide the Magistrates' names and the magistrates did likewise "on account of what happened last time". Mr Scriven asked what had happened last time and the presiding replied "I don't have to tell you". These were different magistrates and clerk!

During the hearing some suited men entered the court and sat where they could converse with the prosecutor. A person well versed in MI5 operations described them as "spooks" -his word for MI5. Mr Scriven lodged his information against the Chief Constable and the CPS in the office of the court and received a stamped receipt tying them in with case with the hand-written note "Re: documents handed re case hearing 14.9.98 07/WA/2092/98". All present described Hayes behaviour as unbelievable and reminiscent of Nazi Germany. In our opinion the magistrates who said next to nothing and sat with downcast eyes were, if anything, worse than Hayes. Blair promised to make fair that which is unfair. We will try to find the names of the former three magistrates who were courteous enough to give Mr Scriven and who showed some interest in what he was saying. We will try also to expose the yellow bellies at what should have been a pre-trial review.

Mr Scriven will confirm that we warned him that this would happen. We had a similar experience in Beaconsfield Magistrates court with a bent Clerk named Locke and a bent presiding magistrate from Beaconsfield Lodge, D E P Nicholson. Blood will eventually flow if Blair does not address the problem of systemic corruption in our legal system. It has been obvious for some time that a "D" Notice applies to all things Scriven. British newspapers are predominantly Jewish owned, are in the pocket of the Bilderberg Council and are an affront to journalism.

***BILDERBERGBLAIRBILDERBERGBROWNBILDERBERGSTRAWBILDERBERGIRVINEBILDERBERGWOOLFEBILDERBERGBINGHAM***

THE LISTENING PARTY

The Tory Party is now claiming to be the listening party. You can be sure it will not listen to concerns about our politico legal system or our complaints about bent judges. The politicians and the judiciary enjoy a symbiotic relationship that excludes the public interest. Will the Tories stop the Home Secretary using the Metropolitan Police as a political weapon against those who disagree with his policies? Will they appoint a Police Committee to be responsible for the Metropolitan Police? Will they sever the link between the Lord Chancellor and the judiciary? Will they abolish the office of Lord Chancellor and appoint a committee, comprising predominantly lay persons, to judge the judges and appoint the judges? Will they make MI5, MI6 and the Special Branch accountable to a lay body? Will they abolish the Police Complaints Authority and the Office for the Supervision of Solicitors? Will they declare the Bilderberg Council an unlawful organisation? Will they bring in legislation requiring the membership of the Brotherhood of Masons to be published for all to see? In short will they stop the systemic corruption in our politico legal system? They could set an example to others by expelling Michael Howard and Sir Nicholas Lyell.

***BILDERBERGBLAIRBILDERBERGBROWNBILDERBERGSTRAWBILDERBERGIRVINEBILDERBERGWOOLFEBILDERBERGBINGHAM***

MARTIN BELL - THE INDEPENDENT ANTI SLEAZE MP

We wrote to Mr Bell on 28 June and asked him if he could ask questions about the Bilderberg Conference at Turnberry in May. To date we have heard nothing. It may be that he is inundated with correspondence. Watch this space. Perhaps some of our readers should drop Mr Bell a line about the same scandalous waste of public money providing a massive police presence complete with weapons and bomb disposal experts to protect a bunch of unknown individuals. George Robertson attended and used an army helicopter. If Martin Bell is the person he claims to be he should have asked questions without any prompting from members of the public.

***BILDERBERGBLAIRBILDERBERGBROWNBILDERBERGSTRAWBILDERBERGIRVINEBILDERBERGWOOLFEBILDERBERGBINGHAM***

LETTER TO THE TIMES FROM THE CAMPAIGN FOR A FAIR HEARING

<<Sir, Sir Frederick Lawton's article "Judging the Judges" (July 14) is welcomed by our campaign. To monitor the judges, we recommend an elected Procedural Complaints Court empowered to set aside decisions if a hearing is misconducted.

An elected and independent body to review complaints could be structured so as to include lay persons as well as practising lawyers balanced by an equal number of academic lawyers. The functioning of a Procedural Complaints Court would naturally indicate which judges might be encouraged to retire early.

Making judges accountable to the public would be a valuable enhancement of British democracy. Yours sincerely, Suzon Forscey-Moore (Organiser)>>

Comment:- Retiring judges is neither punishment nor deterrent. They would have a good pension and could easily take up other remunerative work like forming paedophile rings as in Manchester. If they cause innocent men to spend ten yeas in prison they too should spend ten years in prison. Alternately give them a week or two in the same block as prisoners who are innocent and let the prisoners tear them apart. Equally important is machinery to punish counsel and solicitors. The rack would be a suitable piece of machinery. Tear their heads off (with wigs in the case of counsel) and tuck them underneath their arms.

***BILDERBERGBLAIRBILDERBERGBROWNBILDERBERGSTRAWBILDERBERGIRVINEBILDERBERGWOOLFEBILDERBERGBINGHAM***

NEW DEMOCRACY POLITICS

Write to New Democracy Politics at PO Box 187, Chesterfield Derbs. S40 2DU or phone/fax 01246 555713 and ask for a copy (free) of "Fighting Corruption : A New Power".

***BILDERBERGBLAIRBILDERBERGBROWNBILDERBERGSTRAWBILDERBERGIRVINEBILDERBERGWOOLFEBILDERBERGBINGHAM***

Published by J M Todd, Misbourne Farmhouse, Amersham Road, Chalfont St Giles, Bucks. HP8 4RU