COURT HEARINGS

Alexander Baron at Horseferry Magistrates Court on Friday 26 June at 10.30 a.m.

Geoffrey Scriven at Warrington Magistrates Court on Friday 26 June at 10.30 a.m.

-o-o-o-

THE ROOT OF ALL EVIL - BILDERBERG COUNCIL

Money talks. It talks to politicians and prostitutes. It talks to judges and Jews. It talks to Mafia and milkmen. It talks even to us. The Bilderberg Council has a bottomless purse much of it, no doubt, lodged in the bank vaults of the Seychelles. Its source of income is big business - banks, tobacco companies, oil companies, insurance companies, armaments manufacturers, pharmaceutical companies, chemical companies (drug cartels), news media companies, mineral companies, public utility companies, property companies, motor manufacturers etc. We have earlier reported extreme measures taken on behalf of the Mobil Oil Company against us.

'So, naturists observe, a flea

Hath smaller fleas that on him prey.' Jonathan Swift 1667 - 1745

The Seychelles economy is dependent primarily on income from funds that they hold for organised crime, corrupt politicians, drug cartels and other big monied criminals. There is so much money held by the Seychelles that the World Bank fears that world money markets will be destabilised. Be that as it may no reputable politician would be seen dead in the Seychelles especially during the wet season.

There is no doubt that the Bilderberg Council comprises the JMF referred to above but on an international scale. There can be no doubt that the Scottish Masons hijacked the Labour Party in 1991 or earlier and that it now works to a Bilderberg agenda. The public has a right to know who authorised the massive presence of Strathclyde Police, some of them armed, at the Bilderberg meeting held at Turnberry on 15 May 1998. Who paid for the army helicopter used by George Robertson, MP ? Who paid for the police presence and for the use of the hotel? Do we have a single MP who has the guts to raise the matter in the Commons?

We have been flooded with information about Bilderberg. Please read some of it for yourselves. See the Punch article previously referred to and the long article in the Mail on Sunday, (Night and Day Magazine) of 14 June 1998.

Bilderberg's chief opponents are the independent oil rich Muslim states, Iran, Iraq and Libya and rich Muslim individuals like Mohamed Al Fayed and Asil Nadir and unlike the late Robert Maxwell.

-o-o-o-

MELANIE PHILLIPS AND THE OBSERVER

As we thought Phillips is Jewish as is her husband Joshua Rosenberg, legal mouth for the BBC. Phillips defended Michael Howard by stating that he was being stereotyped as an oily Jew.

THE SUNDAY TIMES, PRINCE CHARLES AND MOHAMED AL FAYED

News International is closely connected with Bilderberg. Last week it mounted a cheap attack on Prince Charles' who opposes genetically engineered plants. That was propaganda in favour of Monsanto Chemicals. The ST also gave Mohamed Al Fayed space to air his views then attempted to rubbish him in an editorial. It succeeded in adding credence to the theory that Princess Diana's death was no accident. It had the gall to rely upon the fact that there was no conspiracy behind the deaths of Marlyn Monro and President Kennedy. Everybody is out of step except the Sunday Times.

-o-o-o-

Letter dated 12 June 1998 from the CAMPAIGN FOR A FAIR HEARING to M. de Salvia, Secretary to the EUROPEAN COMMISSION OF HUMAN RIGHTS, CONSEUIL DE L'EUROPE, F-67075 Strasbourg Cedex, FRANCE

<< Dear M. de Salvia, Your ref.: PL 1170

Having received a letter dated 4 June from J S Philips in regard to the above application, I must file a robust objection to being asked to complete an unnecessary and onerous task, i.e., to "submit proper decisions (with reasoning) in each of the cases."

The 17 applicants are not complaining about the outcome of their cases but about the inappropriate linkage between the judiciary and the politician who appoints them, the Lord Chancellor. His department's covert briefing of judges is indisputable evidence of the violation of several articles of the Convention.

If we had supplied an admission by the UK police that it was a formal but secret policy to arrest every left-handed person who walked into a police station, the guilt or innocence of those people would be irrelevant. The merit or lack of merit in applicants' cases has nothing to do with what is in UK law a conspiracy to defraud to which acting in good faith in the belief that some valid public purpose is being served is no defence. Even if a litigant in person had no complaint about the outcome of his or her case, he/she would still have a legitimate grievance, i.e., the fact that the existence and contents of arguably the most important document in their case had been withheld from them.

J S Phillips knows that the applicants are not asking for redress in their individual cases as he initially sought to reject our petition on that basis. Our application seeks an ECHR ruling that the practice of secret briefings violates rights and freedoms as set out in Articles 6, 10, 13 and 14. The affidavits swearing that the applicants have been litigants in person in the jurisdiction of the High Contracting Party should be sufficient, especially since he has the papers for S N W Lyell, Norman Scarth and Janet Ann Talbot. As there is no demonstrable need for the information requested, once again I must complain about the wilful obstruction of justice.

I formally request that J S Phillips reconsider his demand for irrelevant material and inform me at his earliest convenience that there will be no further delay in processing this application. I remind you that the rights of more than 600 persons per year are being violated.

Yours sincerely, Suzon Forscey-Moore, Organiser. >>

Comment: - We warned CFAFH that Phillips the Filter would obstruct it. Suzon Forscey-Moore should have formally requested that Phillips be strung up by the knackers. The probability is that the Treasury Solicitor dictates how Phillips should frustrate applicants. M de Salvia must have had hundreds of complaints since 1966 about the UK filter. He must know of and go along with this unlawful obstruction. So also must the Commission's judges and the judges of the European Court of Human Rights. They all have their drinking straws in the same spittoon. Money talks to judges. Judges take bribes. This is a Bilderberg symptom. "The working class can kiss my arse for soon we'll rule the world." This cynical disregard for the rights of decent people will inevitably lead to violence.

-o-o-o-

THE SKULDUGGERY OF MANCHESTER'S JUDGES AND SOLICITORS

We have reported how the Lord Chancellor visited Manchester High Court and how he fled when he saw Geoffrey Scriven. Scriven was the victim of fraud committed by the legal profession. Judges have failed to address the fraud. The police are currently harassing him. Three attempts have been made to commit Scriven to prison and to ensure that his allegations are not heard in open court. Scriven will not lie down and has pursued numerous paths to expose the judiciary. He is now suing the Lord Chancellor, the Master of the Rolls, the senior Law Lord, the Treasury Solicitor and his assistant Evans. At the last hearing Justice (Holy) Moses of Matrix Churchill fame, was unable to take a hearing in open court until 5.35 p.m. when the court was closed and the public had departed. The hearing was originally scheduled for 10.30 a.m. Documents presented and remarks made by the judge at the Moses hearing indicated that there was going to be a move to declare Scriven a vexatious litigant. Read on.

Earlier we reported how the Adsheads were victims of Legal Aid fraud that has cost them their home. High Peak District Council is now seeking to have their caravan removed from land that still belongs to them. Justice Jones sent a memo to Judge Maddox telling him to ignore the fraud and asking him to commit the Adsheads to prison because he had reached the end of his tether. Maddox who should have disbarred himself took the Adsheads' appeal hearing and gave them one working day to leave their home or go to prison. Note that the Adsheads were not supposed to see Jones' private memo to Maddox.

Joan Craig, in a case against Oldham Magistrates, appealed District Judge Shannon's order, imposing a £5,000 fine, on the grounds that Shannon had been guilty of misconduct. The appeal judge, Judge Holman, struck out the £5,000 fine and the award of costs against Craig. He also, for reasons known to himself and to us and to you, amended the Plaintiff's submission of "misconduct" to "error in law". Craig is appealing to have "misconduct" reinstated. A judge may strike out a case but he cannot alter a Plaintiff's submission even if it brings discredit on a fellow judge. Joan Craig should allege misconduct by Holman.

Nicholas Haralidis is suing a Manchester Health authority and others. He is seriously ill. All the stops have been puled out to ensure that he dies before he can get a fair hearing. He spent 9 days in a mental hospital that decided he suffered from no mental disability and that he was above average intelligence. On 12 June Haralidis was appealing against a gagging writ following a hearing before Judge Newman on 21 November 1995. At the Newman hearing solicitors for the Health Authority (Hempsons) remained behind when Haralidis left the court. The recording machine was left running and the discussion between Newman and Hempsons recorded. Haralidis got a copy of the transcript of what was clearly a conspiratorial conversation between Hempsons and Newman. They were working out possible ways of obtaining a gagging writ against Haralidis in the current case and in another case that was not before the court. The appeal was set down for 10 a.m. on 12 June. The evening before the hearing a court messenger informed Haralidis that the hearing would be brought forward to 9.30 a.m. and that Justice Poole would take it and not Newman. Newman had become aware of his faux pas from documents lodged for the appeal and was obviously too cowardly to face Haralidis. Haralidis started presenting his case. He decided he would keep his coup de grace until the end. Poole stopped Haralidis before he got to Newman's conspiracy.

These are a few of many cases involving what Geoffrey Scriven calls the "Jewish Mafia" in and surrounding Manchester High Court. In our view that is unfair to Manchester High Court. Irvine is not a Jew. Other courts throughout the country are dispensing justice in the Manchester way. We should be grateful for Manchester's ineptitude in not being careful enough to hide the Jones memo or alter the transcript of the Newman/Hempsons criminal activity.

Note that judicial corruption is a matter for the Lord Chancellor. To this the judges would reply "He that is without sin among us, let the crook first cast a stone at us. The honest classes can kiss our arses 'cause God has chosen us." As Gerald Adshead has stated "There is no law in this country".

-o-o-o-

LEGAL AID FRAUD

Peter Sainsbury (see introduction) has been pursuing the National Audit Office with a view to curtailing widespread fraud. The NAO has ducked and dived. It states that a private firm (Clark Whitehill) audits the Legal Aid books. Mr Sainsbury's MP, Martin Linton, a member of the Home Affairs Select Committee, has been much more helpful. On 8 June 1998 he wrote "Dear Peter, Many thanks for your further letter: please take any action you think fit. Best wishes Martin". His letter will be good for a laugh in the Commons bar.

If any profession is more dishonest than the legal profession it must be the accountancy profession from the cowboy chartered accountants to the DTI including the Official Receiver. Even when Legal Aid fraud is pointed out to the Legal Aid Board (as in the Adsheads' case) the Legal Aid Chief Orchard (former Treasury Solicitor) takes no action.

-o-o-o-

BITS AND PIECES

MARTIN SHORT, author of Inside the Brotherhood, seeks information from jurors who were involved in important cases. All perfectly legal! Phone 0171 435 7351 Fax 0171 794 6575

ROGER WATTS, High Green Farm, Felsham, Bury St Edmunds, Suffolk has just become the victim of an appeal by FPD Savills, major international property consultants. Savills are also selling the drug site here while knowing that it was originally acquired by fraud. Mr Watts now faces a £1 million claim that will cost him his farm and warehouse business. He states "I believe it is a gross miscarriage of justice. The original court hearing which we won was very sound and fair". We could have told Mr Watts what the outcome of his case would be before he started proceedings.

-o-o-o-

Published by J M Todd, Misbourne Farmhouse, Amersham Road, Chalfont St Giles, Bucks. HP8 4RU