WARNING

A Masonic twit is using our identity to post messages to the Internet. He copies our introduction to give authenticity to his postings. The man is physiologically and psychologically sick.

HOW MANY MASONIC JUDGES

It was obvious and we forewarned you that even our accident prone Lord Chancellor would not risk forcing judges out of the Masonic closet. Out of 5,000 judges in England and Wales less than 5% (250) admitted to being Masons. This is another example of Masonic "diversion". We can but speculate about how it was done. When the P2 Lodge was exposed in Italy secret lodges we formed to carry on the corruption. Did the Cardinal ask judges to declare whether they were Freemasons? There are no Freemasons - only Masons. Were the masters of the lodges asked to suspend membership of the judges for the period during which the questionnaire had to be completed? Did the judges resign from membership? Once a Mason always a Mason! Does it matter whether they were Masons since the Lord Chancellor with the approval of the Master of the Rolls secretly briefs judges?

LETTERS

From Councillor Johnston of Dacorum B C (Tel. 01442 866447) 29 November 1998.

### I enclose a cutting from the Yorkshire Post regarding Doncaster Council.

Although he appears to be Grand Architect of the Donnygate Scandal, Councillor Birks has not only kept his seat on the council but has also been allowed to remain on the planning committee.

Contrary to the impression given by the newspaper, there are all manner of offences which can result in the disqualification of a councillor from public office. Taking bribes for granting planning permission is one.

It looks as though Labour's whitewash squad, and its spin-doctors, are doing a good job once again.

Yours sincerely, Ian Johnston. ###

Note:- No man alone can grant planning permission except Two Bellies Prescott. Birks was arrested in connection with allegations of corruption. As chairman of the planning committee that determined an important planning application by a property developer Birks did not declare an interest. That was sufficient for him to be charged with misconduct in public office and, on conviction, being barred from the council. Knowing New Labour and the Attorney General we would opine that Birks is unlikely to be convicted.

CAMPAIGN FOR A FAIR HEARING LETTER

TO THE ATTORNEY GENERAL JOHN MORRIS

### Re your section 42 Application and Geoffrey Harold Scriven

CFAFH makes the strongest possible objection to your application to make Mr Scriven a vexatious litigant. Our grounds are as follows:

(1) Mr Scriven's case was long supported by the respected Labour MP, Mike Hall, who presented an Early Day Motion on 17 March 1997. In the two days before Parliament was prorogued, 14 other Labour MPs agreed with Mike Hall that the Attorney General should treat Mr Scriven with the fairness that had previously been denied him. It would be better to act in accord with this view instead of imitating your predecessor, Sir Nicholas Lyell, who on Christmas Eve 1996, used an obsolete charge to threaten Mr Scriven with fines and indefinite imprisonment. A respectable government listens to whistleblowers; it doesn't threaten them.

(2) It is the view of CFAFH that Mr Scriven is guilty of having too much faith in the UK legal system. Although extreme, his use of language has been that of an honest layman experiencing moral outrage at the conduct of a compliant judiciary. In his presence, judge after judge turned a blind eye to fraud and perjury by a solicitor. On what authority - other than raw power - can you ignore fraud and perjury by a lawyer in order to gag Mr Scriven? It is wrong to favour practitioners of law at the expense of ordinary people. Your salary is derived from the public purser, not from the pockets of your colleagues.

(3) The incorrect dating of the divorce petition cannot be blamed on court staff as 15 August 1992 was a Saturday. If the dating of the document had been an honest mistake as opposed to fraud, why did the solicitor seek to blame court staff whom she should have known could not possibly have been at fault? Mr Scriven has acted upon the legal principle that fraud unravels everything that has gone before. Yet, because there are no checks and balances and no accountability, judge after judge has refused to give due respect to the argument. Mr Scriven has been the victim of judicial bias and cover up. It is wrong to punish the victim. You cannot hope to obtain respect for the legal system, as is your responsibility, by adding to its sins.

(4) At a hearing, a judge handed Mr Scriven the secret summary of his case which had been prepared in the Lord Chancellor's Department. The then Lord Chancellor had assured the public in November 1993 that no submission would be made to a judge except in accordance with natural justice, i.e., with the opportunity for it to be countered by any opposing party. Mr Scriven had been handed evidence that the Lord Chancellor and the judiciary had been conspiring to defraud him of his right to know everything that went before the judge in his case. Conspiracy to defraud is a criminal offence to which, according to the government itself, acting in good faith is no defence. Can you justify prosecuting Mr Scriven for his response and not the Lord Chancellors past and present for provocation?

It is the CFAFH's view that the matter is a contest of wills between the state and one of its citizens. The state is defending its power to overlook relevant points of law, violating the citizen's human rights (Articles 6, 10, 13, 14 of the European Convention) as an act of deference to members of the legal profession. He citizen has returned to court again and again, not in the spirit of frivolity or to create a nuisance, but in the hope that he would be treated fairly.

If you proceed with this application (when you should be doing all you can to put things right) you will be ignoring the issue of proportionality and placing yourself in danger of nonfeasance.

CFAFH takes special issue with Stephen Glendinning's affidavit which is part of your application. Fraud is never "innocuous". Fraud is an act of dishonesty and any lawyer who is dishonest, even in a small way, is showing disdain for the rule of law. It is wrong, therefore, for Stephen Glendinning to conclude that the matter is unimportant because the outcome of the case would have been the same, fraud or no fraud. If lawyers and judges do not respect the rule of law, who should? Fraud is always an attack on the health of a society. Just as a medical practitioner must not ignore any symptom of illness, legal practitioners must attend to any disease of the legal profession. To do otherwise offends against fundamental legal principles.

Before the General Election, Labour promised it would change what is wrong. To favour Judge Goff while ignoring and then harassing Geoffrey Scriven is continuing what is wrong: one law for the legal profession and vested interests and another for ordinary people.

CFAFH requests that you withdraw this wrongful application and that you investigate, as per EDM, the injustice done to Mr Scriven.

Yours sincerely, Suzon Forscey-Moore, Organiser. ###

DUNBLANE PAEDOPHILE MASONS (1)

Received on 1 December from Glenn Harrison, Gerdavatn, Baltasound, Unst, Shetland ZE2 9DY. Ph.01957 711578.

### The following letter was first sent in November 1996 to the Shetland Times of Lerwick, the Press and Journal of Aberdeen, HRH the Duke of Edinburgh and the Gun Club of Great Britain. None of these replied. The substance of the same letter was sent to the House of Commons last year.

"With regard to recent publicity correlating secret organisations with paedophilia, particularly the Masons, I would like to bring to your attention the link between the abuse of boys at the Queen Victoria School (QVS), Dunblane, the large presence of Freemasons in that establishment and the slaughter of 16 children and a teacher at Dunblane by Thomas Hamilton on 13 March 1996. As far as I know no such link was revealed in the Cullen report. In June 1994 I released a report about my own experience as a housemaster at QVS. A copy of my report was sent to almost every Scottish education authority in July 1994.

I believe that, had my allegations in 1991 been properly investigated, there is a strong possibility that Hamilton would have been discovered. His signature in the visitors log have since been removed. The awful slaughter in March 1996 could have been prevented by an impartial police investigation.

In my report of June 1994 I accused the Ministry of Defence (MOD), the Scottish Office and the Procurator Fiscal of a deliberate cover up and of maladministration at the QVS.

The Masonic presence in the local police and in the QVS establishment was strong. It is a fact that Hamilton was enrolled in Lodge number 1417 (Garrow Hill) in 1977. He was granted a firearms certificate in 1979. It was no idle boast when Hamilton claimed that he was "a friend of the police" (Masons). In March 1996, just after the slaughter, Hamilton's file went missing. Hamilton was a regualr visitor to the primary department of QVS. I saw him on several occasions as a friend of another housemaster. He was one of many visitors. I assumed that the school security had cleared him. Nothing of this was in the Cullen report. Lord Cullen is a Mason with a duty to protect brother Masons.

There is evidence to show corruption and maladministration by the police. The following statement will show why the police are not going to be investigated. ### (Statement next week perhaps).

DACORUM PAEDOPHILE MASONS

The report that follows is exactly as we received it.

### Two employees of Dacorum College, sited next door to the council Civic Centre, were using a Dacorum College computer to download paedophile porn.

The college management were so sickened by the two paedophiles that one was suspended pending investigation while the other was going to be dismissed for misconduct and reported to the police. Both paedophiles are Unison members.

The leader of Dacorum council, councillor Julia Coleman, is employed as the head of the local government section of Unison at Reading. She is also shacked up with the vice chair of the police authority. Also Dacorum councillor Margaret Coxage is a Unison employee in the section that the two paedophiles are members of.

So we have two Unison beggars on horseback protecting two perverts on kids' backs. Both paedophiles have been reinstated and the case has been covered up by Unison. ###

Comment:- Hear the Unison side of this story before you to believe it. Dacorum borough council is dominated and polluted by Freemasonry. It follows that the Masonry has Coleman in its pocket. The most likely explanation for this scandal is that the paedophiles are Masons. As far as we know Coleman's bed mate is not a paedophile. Any criminal worth his salt, be he paedophile or bank robber, will join the Masons in order to cover his back. See Hamilton/Dunblane above.

THE AUTOMOBILE ASSOCIATION

We have complaints that the AA is serving the oil companies and the motor industry better than it is serving its members. Would any user of "Powerplus" please let us have your comments on the performance? Perhaps Powerplus will explain what an "ultra-destructable label" (sic) is. For information about Powerplus telephone 01323 417700 or fax 01323 417800.

SOLICITORS' INDEMNITY FUND

Gerald Adshead (Ph/Fax 01298 813182) feels that members of the public should be advised that when a solicitor commits a criminal offence the SIF will not pay out. The public already knows that if it sets fire to its property there is no insurance cover. The problem with the SIF, Ombudsmen and their like is that they claim that a crime has been committed after the police have failed to prosecute. Catch 22!

OFFICE FOR THE SUPERVISION OF SOLICITORS

LITIGANTS IN PERSON (LIPS)

We thank all LIPS for their support. With amusement we note their different explanations for not being openly associated with us. Unfortunately LIPS fail to appreciate that nobody is interested in their cases - not even other LIPS. They are unlikely to believe that henceforward they will face discrimination in the work place, by the police, banks, insurance companies and building societies. Their children will be disadvantaged too. We are certain that the cause of most of the corruption in the UK, including UK courts, is Freemasonry. There are millions of people who take the view that Freemasonry is a bad thing. If LIPS want change they have to stand up and be counted and form an anti-Mason party. Geoffrey Scriven has shown that he has guts. He will be gagged by the Attorney General but he will cause even more havoc when this happens. He has been fighting the LIPS battle while they run around trying to curry favour with their persecutors.

THE SOUTH AFRICAN MASONS

Nelson Mandela became a Mason in 1994. We can already see the result of this. There is anarchy with organised crime rampant. South African police have been acting as runners for loan shark Mark Thatcher. They faced criminal charges because they ripped him off. We require information about drug running. We want to hear more about Hellmann International Forwarders, ex-patriates Adrian C Watson and John Sargood and surgeon Philip Raby Walbaum. Cape Town connection?

THE BOARD OF DEPUTIES OF BRITSH JEWS

Last week we suggested that the Board could make a start to bridge building by setting up a Jewish body to investigate corruption in the legal system. So far there has been no response. We wonder why?

STILL TO COME

What followed our two years in prison before being acquitted. The One Nation Anti-Mason Party which now has a membership of four. Maurice Kellett and Sunderland Masons. Alexander Baron's new frame-up. Lloyds swindles. Chiltern District Council planning corruption at Siblets Wood, Hill Farm, the Vache, Misbourne House, Misbourne Farm.

Published by J M Todd, Misbourne Farmhouse, Amersham Road, Chalfont St Giles, Bucks. HP8 4RU