CALLING ALL INVESTIGATIVE REPORTERS RE THE POLICE STATE

Recently we reported that Charles Beresford (Dacorum again!) had been threatened with harassment proceedings by Warwickshire Constabulary because he had telephoned Local Government Ombudsman White at his invitation. White is the man who had direct access to the Grand Secretary of the United Grand Lodge to ascertain how many Masons were involved following a complaint about local government planning corruption on the Isle of Wight.

Last Monday Alexander Baron appeared at the Inner London Crown Court before HHJ Philpot to appeal against a finding that he had harassed a member of the Benefits Agency. The charge was based upon the fact that Baron had written two indignant letters to an official complaining about the actions of a second official. The charge was ludicrous. When Baron returned from court he was met by police officers who arrested him and seized his computer and files. He was accused of having made a threatening telephone call to the same official. At the police station he was shown a publication about the Benefits Agency. It gave the names and addresses of Benefits officials and judges. The inference was that Baron had published that document too. In fact Baron had not made the telephone call and knew nothing about the document. Subsequently Baron was convicted of harassment on the basis of the two letters and the telephone call.

Baron thoroughly investigated the telephone records that tended to show that the prosecution had made the telephone call to the Benefits Agency and also to a firm of solicitors. There was not a shred of evidence that Baron had made the call other than that he could have made the call because he was at the court, whence the call was made, at the material time.

Judge Philpot decided that it was unlikely that Baron would have gone to such lengths to check the telephone records if he had made the call. He accepted that Baron had not made the call. Baron's appeal was dismissed. He was fined £500 but was not obliged to pay the fine because he had spent one day in custody. He was found liable for costs amounting to £150.

That is the tip of the iceberg. If the law states that a person sending two indignant letters to a third party critical of a second party constitutes a criminal offence we are living in a police state. If a person makes several telephone calls, in an attempt to speak to someone, is committing a criminal offence we are living in a police state. Let us hope that there is an investigative reporter who feels that freedom of speech matters in a democracy. Alexander Baron's address and telephone number are 93c Venner Road, Sydenham, London SE26 5HU. Tel. 0181 659 7713. Charles Beresford's details are 191 Belswains Lane, Hemel Hempstead, Herts HP3 9XA. Tel. 01442 246987 Fax 01442 249999.

We reported the assault on Norman Scarth (Fax/Ph 0113 262 0449) , the arrest of another man and the ejection of Marisa Sarda de Waite (Ph/Fax 01926 633462) from a police van. The policeman called this respectable lady, who has a grown up family, a "Spanish whore" - another example of police racism. These too were High Court incidents.

THE DACORUM MASONIC CESSPOOL

Statement from David Fisher B.A. Honours Oxon, Secretary of Dacorum Action Group, regarding the Herald Express (Hemel Hempstead) article stating that Dacorum Council cannot take action for libel.

### The reason the council is powerless to stop the exposure of the indictable offences that it has committed is that the allegations against it are true. Also it knows that it will not be able to pursue a libel action because it would result in members of the Dacorum Action Group giving evidence of Misconduct in Public Office by council officers. The Group has also an established defence in a libel action that statements had been made in the public interest. The council should take note of the Jonathan Aitken case. ###

What about criminal libel, David? If the police haven't prosecuted there is no libel. Catch 22 for the police!

LETTER FROM GENERALISSIMO PINOCHET

Most esteemed Editor of Vomit,

### Muchas gratias for defending my humble self on the Internet. These Espaniards are bullfighters but they are bigger bull shitters. I never ordered the killing of nobody or killed one of the sons of commie bitches. If I am guilty then Windybag Blare is responsible for all the pederasty, cruising and adultery in his cabinet. To the Windybag I say "Me cajo en la puta". The American Bilderbergers got their President to provide us with the tools of war because they thought that Allende would follow the example set by Hitler and Stalin. And the Bilderbergers were right. Allende's commies were just like your Blairite socialist mendicants on the horse's backside. Why do not the Espaniards indict the President of the United States? Then there are your "pewfs". We call them pederasts. I see that your great muck-raking Sun has published that Brown and Mandelson have been outed. Does Butch Whelan serenade Brown with "Te quiero mucho"? Have you noticed the lascivious way Brown rolls his tongue while he talks and his Rs when he walks? What a nerve that arse bandido Mandelson has. Is he Jewish? If he sets his mincing feet on Chile soil I will grab his pelotas and use them as a cravat. Me a murderer? What did the Israelis do in the Lebanon and Palestine? What about the bombing of Dresden? What about the Serbs in Kosovo or your killings in Ireland and Gibraltar? Your esteemed Senator Alain Clerk said "There are too many Jew boys in the cabinet". Senor Clerk also said, " No truly objective historian could refrain from admiring this man (Hitler)". In my modest way I claim no praise for helping your pewfs against Galtieri in the Falklands battle. The Americanos ordered me to do that too.

Your countrymen are showing that they have some courage. Chileans cheer the good work of the Dacorum Freedom Fighters who are causing panic amongst the Jewish Masonic fascistos. Then there is your One Nation Anti-Mason Party with its two members including yourself. Now you know why your victims are victims. You can make me an honorary member if only pour encourager les autres. Selflessness is a rare virtue. Your policemen are good. When I want a snort of cocaine I have only to ask my guard. The Metropolitan Commissioner contacts one of his "significant minority" who sends me some coke. That supply may dry up because I have asked our government to stop supplying the UK. ### We must cut you off here Pino. Hope your senile dementia improves with time. Please note that there is no evidence of pederasty in the cabinet. It was Harold Wilson's government that prevented the prosecution of two pederasts, Tom Driberg and Bob Boothby, who sodomised youths procured for them under duress by one of the Kray twins. That delayed police action against the Krays. Labour does not change with time. It still feels that it must stress the importance of family values. The cabinet sets a fine example with its pewfs and adulterers.

THE PEWFY CENSORS AT THE BBC

The BBC is supposed to be an independent public service. It ordered commentators on its programmes, even cabinet ministers, not to mention the shirtlifting antics of Mandelson. It increased interest in the cabinet brown hatters. This is a corporation that produces programmes that are 100% homosexual as well as a whole plethora of rubbishy programmes with regular reminders of the Holocaust and the atrocities of the Nazis. It blunders on from blunder to blunder squandering public money and paying its executives ever-increasing salaries. It is now an unabashed propagandist for New Labour pewfs. We say that it is time this anachronism was privatised.

We are not queer bashers any more than we are thalidomide or wheelchair bashers. Pewfs make unwanted approaches to men who are strangers. There is a shortage of pewf partners. The true pewfs are not easily identified at first glance. When we had public toilets there were always pathetic pewfs hanging around them. In pubs more subtle approaches were made. In some top class hotels a male could not go to the toilet without an offer of help from a wine waiter. In the streets, after dark, the same thing happened in West London with both men and women. We called the women, rather unkindly, prostitutes. If Ron Davies was propositioned in Clapham Common he could have escaped by saying that he was unemployed and HIV positive. Where there's a will there's a way.

The reason for not appointing pewfs to government lies in the fact that they are vulnerable to blackmail. Pewfs are also susceptible to fits of extreme jealousy if their partners give another pewf the glad eye. Mathew Parris, another pewf, did the dirty when he outed Mandelson. The reason for not appointing adulterers to government is that, if they can cheat on their partners and family, they can cheat in government. Mind you we cannot say, hands on heart, that any UK politician is honest. As Ron Davies might have said "I did not have sexual relations with that man. Monicker Stravinski".

THE SUPERMARKETS

It is a fact that our supermarkets are overcharging and selling foodstuffs of doubtful value and quality. ASDA may not be guilty. From their massive profits (your money filched from you) they effectively bribe governments in return for favours. The favours granted by this government include planning permissions that are totally opposed by the local authority and the electorate. Make a complaint to the stores and it is ignored because they have immunity from sanctions. They offer you vouchers and continue to swindle the public. You have the example of apples that are stored for one year, have their vitamin content reduced by 50% and have been acquired in a manner that has ruined apple growers. Another example is the XXX tinned steak swindle. Initially there were chunks of steak in the cans. Then came an offer of 15% extra free. The contents were an emulsified mess of God knows what. Sales of XXX steak fall. A company with a name for quality will eventually go out of business because the supermarkets had a stranglehold on it.

In the Labour election manifesto there was an undertaking to set up a food standards agency to protect consumers. Following pressure from the supermarkets Windbag Blair has backtracked. The agency will not be set up this year or next year and probably never while the supermarkets are allowed to make "contributions" to Labour Party causes. The danger is that by the time the beggars on horseback take action there will be no producers left in the UK. The Seychelles will sink further into the ocean weighed down by Labour gold. Israel will have its banks full.

MORAY COUNCIL

We have received an unsolicited message from a person going under the name of Mike Alexander. He claims to be part of Moray Council. He and several of his sympathisers have been finding fault with VOMIT postings to the Internet. Alexander states "As to corruption in Moray I am not aware of any and so cannot comment" and "None of my colleagues, former or otherwise, are or have been Masons".

How does this man know that none of his council acquaintances belong to the secret society? You may judge for yourself whether there is corruption and whether Alexander is attempting to conceal corruption in Moray council and in local government generally. We take the example of Moray's Chief Executive, Anthony Connell, who has just been sacked from his £70,000 per year job for fiddling expenses. He was not prosecuted, as he should have been. He was given a going away present of £20,000 by the council and the council met most of his legal costs. If that isn't corruption what is?

Another witless cretin, giving his name as Arsangel, has joined forces with Alexander. We believe they are one and the same. Arsangel states that a nasty group within Moray council had it in for Connell and ousted him. Connell was sacked for gross misconduct. Why did the nasty group pay him £20,000 and some of his legal expenses? It looks as if Moray Council is typically Masonic and corrupt but we must make further enquiries before passing judgement.

THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS

Re Warrington Magistrates Court 2 November 1998

To Mr David Calvert-Smith, QC, Director of Public Prosecutions

### Dear Director, Your fax 0171 329 8366

It would be helpful if you could acknowledge receipt of this faxed letter by return fax to 01494 870031.

Mr Geoffrey Scriven (Tel 0161 428 0764 Fax 0161 428 1159) NASA, 85 High Street, CHEADLE, Cheshire SK8 1AB commenced a private prosecution against Clerk to the Justices, D C Swift, in the Warrington court. Mr Swift informed Mr Scriven that, in order to improve his chances of having a fair hearing, the case would be heard in a Macclesfield court. Mr Scriven appeared there at 9.45 a.m. on 29 October before a stipendiary magistrate named P K Dodd. The Halton and Warrington Petty Sessions employ Mr Dodd. His address is the same as that of Mr Swift.

I believe that the CPS at Warrington was involved in the frame-up against Mr Scriven and the gross abuses of the legal process giving rise to the private prosecution.

My reason for asking you to respond quickly is to enable my associates and me to know whether your appointment as DPP is going to clean up the CPS that is badly in need of a clean-up. ###

Mr Scriven is also suing senior partner John Niel McKenna, of James Chapman & Co, concerning the lodging of a fraudulent backdated document. Chapmans manage the Solicitors Indemnity Fund. Thereby hangs a tale. By letter dated 5 November Chapmans informed Mr Scriven that the hearing set down for 6 November had been adjourned indefinitely because Mrs Justice Steele had declined to hear the case. Mrs. Justice Steele also declined to take a case related to a hearing before District Judge Needham. Needham, in his judgement, stated effectively that Mr Scriven had argued his case before him. Mr Scriven was in fact hospitalised at the time of the hearing.

Mr Scriven is of the view that Mrs Justice Steele is honest because she has refused to take these cases. Our view is that Mr Scriven will be silenced before any of his cases are properly determined.

NICHOLAS HARABALADIS & LORD WOOLF

During the week Mr Harabaladis (Nick) appeared before Master of the Rolls, Lord Woolf, in an attempt to have his gagging writ lifted. ( Section 42 of the Supreme Court Act 1981). Nick has a claim against a heath authority in the Manchester area. The first attempt to gag him was an order from Manchester District Registry that he should undergo psychiatric tests. He was examined and found to be intelligent and articulate with no evidence of mental illness. The hearing before Lord Woolf was to be limited to 20 minutes, increased to 40 minutes after Nick protested, but not nearly long enough. It seems strange to us that a fine judge like Lord Woolf should hear a case like this and go along with the time limit. Nick was the man involved in a case where the recording machine was left running while the health authority lawyers discussed with the judge ways of silencing Nick. Lord Woolf had this brought to his attention. He smiled and took no action. Something far wrong here!

We again do not have space for what followed our two years on remand in Armley Prison - a story that you are unlikely to believe anyway.

 Published by J M Todd, Misbourne Farmhouse, Amersham Road, Chalfont St Giles, Bucks. HP8 4RU